SCHEDULE 14A
(Rule 14a-101)


INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION


Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. XX))


Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]
Check the appropriate box:
[ ]Preliminary Proxy Statement[ ]Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12
[ ]Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[X]x]Definitive Proxy Statement
[ ]Definitive Additional Materials

VISHAY PRECISION GROUP, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X]No fee required.
[ ]Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
5)Total fee paid:
[ ]Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:
[ ]Check box if any part of the fee is offset as providedFee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2)Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.
1)Amount previously paid:
2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
3)Filing Party:
4)Date Filed:
0-11.









VISHAY PRECISION GROUP, INC.

3 GREAT VALLEY PARKWAY

SUITE 150


MALVERN, PENNSYLVANIA 19355
 
April 15, 20169, 2024
 
Dear Stockholder:
 
You are cordially invited to attend the 20162024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Vishay Precision Group, Inc., to be held at 9:00 a.m., local time, on Thursday,Wednesday, May 26, 2016, at22, 2024. The Desmond Hotel and Conference Center, 1 Liberty Boulevard, Malvern, PA 19355. The Board of Directors looks forward to greeting you personally atmeeting will be held in a virtual format via the annual meeting.Internet.
 
During the annual meeting, we will discuss each item of business described in the attached Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and proxy statement and provide a report on Vishay Precision Group’s business operations. There will also be time for questions.
 
On behalf of the Board of Directors, I would like to express our appreciation for your continued interest in the affairs of Vishay Precision Group. We hope you will be able to attend the annual meeting. Whether or not you expect to attend the annual meeting, and regardless of the number of shares you own, it is important to us and to our business that your shares are represented and voted at the annual meeting. Therefore, you are encouraged to vote over the Internet, as well as by telephone, or, if you requested to receive printed proxy materials, by mailing a proxy or voting instruction card, so that your shares will be represented and voted at the 20162024 Annual Meeting. Please review the instructions on each of your voting options described in this proxy statement, as well as in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials you received in the mail.
 
Sincerely,



/s/ Marc ZandmanSaul Reibstein
Marc ZandmanSaul Reibstein
Chairman of the Board of Directors
 









VISHAY PRECISION GROUP, INC.

3 GREAT VALLEY PARKWAY

SUITE 150


MALVERN, PENNSYLVANIA 19355
 
NOTICE OF 20162024 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON THURSDAY
WEDNESDAY, MAY 26, 201622, 2024
 
The 20162024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Vishay Precision Group, Inc. will be held at The Desmond Hotel and Conference Center, 1 Liberty Boulevard, Malvern, PA 19355, on Thursday,Wednesday, May 26, 201622, 2024 at 9:00 a.m., local time. The meeting will be held in a virtual format via the Internet. You will be able to attend the 2024 Annual Meeting as well as vote and submit your questions during the live webcast of the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/VPG2024.

The meeting will be held to consider and act upon:
 
1.
1.The election of sixeight directors to hold office until the annual meeting of stockholders in 2017;2025;
2.2.The ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2016; and2024;
3.The advisory vote on executive compensation of named executive officers; and
4.3.Such other business as may be brought properly before the meeting.
 
Our stockholders of record at the close of business on April 4, 2016March 25, 2024 will be entitled to vote at the annual meeting or at any adjournment thereof. Whether or not you expect to attend the meeting, in person, we encourage you to read this proxy statement and submit your proxy or voting instructions as soon as possible. For specific instructions on how to vote your shares, please refer to the instructions under the heading “How do I vote my shares? Can I vote electronically?” on page 3 of this proxy statement; the instructions on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials you received in the mail; or, if you requested to receive printed proxy materials, your enclosed proxy card.
 
By Order of the Board of Directors,
 

/s/ Roland B. DesiletsWilliam M. Clancy
Roland B. DesiletsWilliam M. Clancy
Vice President, General CounselChief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary
 

Malvern, Pennsylvania

April 15, 2016
9, 2024

Important Notice Regarding theof Internet Availability of Proxy Materials for the

Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be Held on May 26, 2016.

22, 2024.
 
The Proxy Statement for the 20162024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and our 20152023 Annual Report to

Stockholders are available for view on the Investor Relations page of our website:

http:
 
https://www.vpgsensors.com
ir.vpgsensors.com

















TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
SECTIONPAGE
SECTIONPAGE
5
10
11
14
15
17
Executive Compensation20
29
30
39
Other Matters41
41
41


















VISHAY PRECISION GROUP, INC.

3 GREAT VALLEY PARKWAY

SUITE 150

MALVERN, PENNSYLVANIA 19355
________________
PROXY STATEMENT

________________
 
The accompanying proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors of Vishay Precision Group, Inc. for use at the 20162024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at The Desmond Hotel and Conference Center, 1 Liberty Boulevard, Malvern, PA 19355 on Thursday,Wednesday, May 26, 201622, 2024 at 9:00 a.m., local time, or any adjournments thereof.time. The meeting will be held in a virtual format via the Internet.
ABOUT THE MEETING
Why are we holding the 20162024 Annual Meeting?
As a matter of good corporate practice, and in compliance with applicable corporate law and the rules of the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE"), we hold a meeting of stockholders annually. This year’s meeting will be held on May 26, 2016.22, 2024. There will be at least twothree items of business that must be voted on by our stockholders at the meeting, and our Board of Directors (the “Board”) is seeking your proxy to vote on these items. This proxy statement contains important information about Vishay Precision Group, Inc. and the matters that will be voted on at the meeting. Please read these materials carefully so that you have the information you need to make informed decisions. Throughout this proxy statement, we will refer to ourselves as “Vishay Precision Group, Inc.,” “VPG,” “we,” “our,” or the “Company.”
Why did I receive a notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials instead of a full set of proxy materials?
In accordance with rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), we may furnish proxy materials, including this proxy statement and our 20152023 Annual Report to Stockholders, to our stockholders by providing access to such documents on the Internet instead of mailing printed copies. Most stockholders will not receive printed copies of the proxy materials unless they request them. Instead, the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”), which is being mailed to our stockholders on or about April 15, 2016,9, 2024, will instruct you as to how you may access and review all of the proxy materials on the Internet. The Notice also instructs you as to how you may submit your proxy on the Internet. If you would like to receive a paper or email copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials in the Notice.
What is a proxy?
A proxy is your legal designation of another person to vote the shares of stock that you own. The person you designate to vote your shares is also called a proxy. When you submit a proxy, the people named on the proxy card are required to vote your shares at the annual meeting in the manner you have instructed.
What is the record date and why is it important?
The record date is the date used by our Board to determine which stockholders are entitled to receive notice of, and vote on the items presented at, the annual meeting. Our Board established April 4, 2016March 25, 2024 as the record date for the 20162024 Annual Meeting.
What is the difference between “Stockholders of Record” and “Beneficial Owners”?
If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, you are considered to be the stockholder of record of those shares. The Notice or this proxy statement, annual report and proxy card have been sent directly to you by the Company.

1




If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name.” ThisThe Notice or this proxy statement, andthe annual report, and voting instruction form have been forwarded to you by your broker, bank, or nominee, who is considered, with respect to those shares, the stockholder of record. As the beneficial

1




owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank, or nominee how to vote your shares by using the voting instruction card included in the mailing or by following their instructions for voting.
Who can attend the meeting?
All stockholders as of the record date, or their duly appointed proxies, are invited to attend the meeting.The meeting will be held in a virtual format via the Internet. Stockholders may participate in, and may vote and ask questions at, the annual meeting by visiting the following website: www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/VPG2024. To participate in or vote or ask questions at the annual meeting, you will need the 16-digit control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, on your proxy card or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials.

What proposals will I be voting on and how does the Board of Directors recommend I vote?
The Board’s recommendations are set forth together with the description of each proposal in this proxy statement. In summary, the Board recommends a vote:
FOR the election of sixeight directors to hold office for terms of one year or until their successors are duly elected and qualified (see Proposal One);

FOR the ratification of the appointment of ErnstBrightman Almagor Zohar & Young LLPCo., a firm in the Deloitte Global Network, as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 20162024 (see Proposal Two);
FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation for our named executive officers (see Proposal Three); and

for or against any other matters that come before the 20162024 Annual Meeting, as the proxy holders deem advisable.
Does VPG have more than one class of stock outstanding?
We have two classes of stock outstanding, common stock and Class B common stock. On the record date, there were 12,152,80312,362,918 shares of common stock and 1,025,1581,022,887 shares of Class B common stock outstanding and entitled to vote.
What are the voting rights of each class of stock?
Each share of common stock will be entitled to one vote and each share of Class B common stock will be entitled to 10 votes with respect to each matter to be voted on at the annual meeting.
A list of stockholders entitled to vote at the annual meeting will be available for examination by VPG’s stockholders during ordinary business hours for a period of ten days prior to the annual meeting at our headquarters, 3 Great Valley Parkway, Suite 150, Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355. A stockholder list will also be available for examination at the annual meeting.
What constitutes a quorum?
A quorum is the minimum number of votes required to be present at the annual meeting to conduct business. As set forth in VPG’s by-laws, the holders of a majority of the votes represented by the outstanding shares of common stock and Class B common stock, voting together as a single class, present in personvirtually, or represented by proxy, will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the annual meeting.
What vote is required to approve each proposal?
On each matter to be voted on at the 20162024 Annual Meeting, the holders of common stock and Class B common stock will vote together as a single class. Assuming a quorum is present, the vote required and method of calculation for the proposals to be considered at the annual meeting are as follows:
2




Proposal One. The election of sixeight directors to hold office for terms of one year, or until their successors are duly elected and qualified, requiresqualified. Directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast, with respect to each directorship.
which means that the eight nominees receiving the most "FOR" votes will be elected.

Proposal Two. The ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as VPG’sour independent registered public accounting firm for thefiscal year ending December 31, 20162024 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on Proposal Two.

Other MattersProposal Three. All other matters voted on at the 2016 Annual Meeting will be determined byThe advisory approval of our executive compensation requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Meeting.on Proposal Three.
Other Matters. Aside from the twothree proposals above, we are not aware of any other matter to be presented at the 20162024 Annual Meeting.

2




How are abstentions, and broker non-votes and withholding of authority considered?
Shares represented by proxies that are properly marked “abstain” will be counted for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum at the 20162024 Annual Meeting. Abstentions will have no effect on the election of directors under Proposal One or on the vote under Proposal Two.Two or Proposal Three.
Brokers holding shares for beneficial owners in street name must vote those shares according to specific instructions they receive from the beneficial owners. If instructions are not received, brokers may only vote the shares, in their discretion, on matters for which they are not precluded from exercising their discretion by the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”).NYSE. Under the NYSE rules, a broker is permitted to vote shares on routine matters, which include ratifying the appointment of independent auditors, but do not include the election of directors or the approval, on an advisory basis, of a resolution approving our executive compensation. Accordingly, brokers may not vote in their discretion only on Proposal Two.One or Proposal Three. For your vote to be counted with respect to Proposal One or Proposal Three, you will need to communicate your voting decisionsinstructions to your bank, broker or other holder of record before the date of the 20162024 Annual Meeting.
A broker “non-vote” occurs when a broker holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the broker does not have discretionary voting power with respect to that item and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner. Broker non-votes will be counted in determining whether there is a quorum at the annual meeting but will not be regarded as votes cast. Because the Company has a plurality voting standard for the election of directors and because the other proposal on the agenda will be determined by a majority of the votes cast, brokerBroker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on Proposal One or on the vote under Proposals Two and Three, inasmuch as broker non-votes are not counted as votes cast with respect to any matter on which the broker has expressly not voted.

A stockholder’s withholding of the proposals.authority to vote for a director nominee will not be counted as a vote and has no legal effect.
How do I vote my shares? Can I vote electronically?
If you are a holderstockholder of record of our common stock as of the record date, there are four ways to vote:
On the Internet. You can vote over the Internet at www.proxyvote.com, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, by following the instructions on your proxy card. You will need the 12-digit16-digit control number included on your proxy card.

Over the Phone. You can vote using a touch-tone telephone by calling 1-800-690-6903, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, and following the instructions on your proxy card.

By Mail. If you requested a copy of our proxy materials by mail, you may complete, sign and mail your enclosed proxy card to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge Financial Solutions, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

In Person. Virtually, during the meeting. You may vote by written ballot at the annual meeting.
The shares represented by your proxy, whether voted using the Internet, by phone, or mail, will be voted as directed with respect to each of the proposals set forth in the proxy statement, OR, if no direction is indicated by your proxy for a proposal, atin accordance with the recommendation of the Board.
You may either vote “for all” or “withhold” your vote for the election of the director nominees under Proposal One, or you may vote for only some of the nominees. You may vote “for,” “against,” or “abstain” on Proposal Two.Two and Proposal Three.
3





If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you must follow the instructions provided by your broker, bank, or nominee on how to vote.

Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, we strongly encourage you to vote by proxy prior to the meeting.
Can I change my vote after I return my proxy card?
Yes. You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the 20162024 Annual Meeting. In order to revoke your proxy, you may either:
sign, and timely return, another proxy card bearing a later date;
provide written notice of the revocation to VPG’s Corporate Secretary; or
attend the annual meeting and vote in person.during the meeting.
If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you must follow the instructions provided by your broker, bank, or nominee on how to revoke your proxy.

3




What will happen if I provide my proxy but do not vote on one or more proposals?
If you are thea stockholder of record, holder of your shares, you should provide voting instructions for all proposals appearing on the proxy card. The persons named as proxies on the enclosed proxy card will vote your shares according to your instructions. However, if you fail to provide instructions on how you want your shares to be voted, properly signed and dated proxies will be voted in accordance with the recommendation of the Board.
If you hold your shares in “street name,” you should provide voting instructions for all proposals appearing on the proxy card to your broker, bank, or other holder of record. If you do not provide voting instructions for all proposals, your broker, bank, or other holder of record might not be authorized to vote your shares on certain matters, in which event they will be recorded as “broker non-votes.” See the discussion under the heading “How are abstentions, and broker non-votes and withholding of authority considered?” above.
 
What will happen if I do not provide my proxy?
If you are a stockholder of record, your shares will not be voted unless you attend the 20162024 Annual Meeting and vote your shares in person.
during the meeting.
If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, your broker, bank, or other holder of record might not be authorized to vote your shares on certain matters and they will be recorded as “broker non-votes.” See the discussion under the heading “How are abstentions, and broker non-votes and withholding of authority considered?” above.


Who paid to send me the proxy materials?
The cost of production and mailing of proxy materials, and the solicitation of proxies, is borne by VPG. The Board may use the services of VPG’s directors, officers and other regular employees to solicit proxies personally or by telephone. Arrangements will be made with brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward solicitation material to the beneficial owners of the shares held of record by such fiduciaries, and VPG will reimburse them for the reasonable expenses incurred by them in so doing.


Who is assuming the expense of the proxy solicitation?


VPG engaged Alliance Advisors, LLC to assist with the solicitation of proxies and provide related advice and informational support for a services fee and reimbursement of customary disbursements, the total of which is not expected to exceed $10,000.




4







Are there any stockholders who own more than 5% of VPG’s shares or voting power?
According to filings made with the SEC, Dimensional Fund Advisors LP, BlackRock, Inc., Royce & Associates, LP, and the Vanguard Group each own greater than 5% of VPG’s outstanding common stock.

Ruta Zandman, the widow of the late founder of our technology, Dr. Felix Zandman, Ziv Shoshani (Mrs. Ruta Zandman’s nephew and our Chief Executive Officer and a member of our Board of Directors) and Marc Zandman (Dr. Felix Zandman's son and a member of our Board of Directors) are co-trustees of a family trust which holds 3,010 shares of common stock and 615,487 shares of Class B common stock, representing less than 1% of our common stock and approximately 60% of our class B common stock, respectively, and, together, 27.0% of the aggregate voting power of the outstanding capital stock of the Company. Additionally, pursuant to a voting agreement with certain third parties, Mrs. Zandman has the power to direct the voting of 171,609 shares of Class B common stock held by such third parties. Therefore, Ruta Zandman controls, solely or on a shared basis with Marc Zandman and Ziv Shoshani, approximately 34.5% of the total voting power of our capital stock; Marc Zandman controls, solely or on a shared basis with Ruta Zandman and Ziv Shoshani, approximately 27.1% of the total voting power of our capital stock; and Ziv Shoshani controls, solely or on a shared basis with Ruta Zandman and Marc Zandman, approximately 28.0% of the total voting power of our capital stock. Each of Ruta Zandman, Marc Zandman, Ziv Shoshani and the family trust intend to vote FOR ALL nominees in Proposal One, FOR Proposal Two and FOR Proposal Three. Pursuant to an agreement relating to the family trust, each of them is required to cause shares controlled by the trust to be voted in support of the election of Messrs. Shoshani and Zandman as directors of the Company.
See “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” for more information. Except as described above, none of these 5% or greater stockholders have indicated their intentions to VPG regarding matters to be voted on at the annual meeting.
5




GOVERNANCE OF THE COMPANY
 
How is VPG governed?
At VPG, day-to-day business activities are carried out by our employees under the direction and supervision of Ziv Shoshani, our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). The Board oversees these activities. In doing so, each director is required to apply his or her business judgment in the best interests of VPG and its stockholders. The Board’s primary responsibilities include:
Review of our performance, strategies, and major decisions;
Oversight of our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and the integrity of our financial statements;
Oversight of management, including review of the CEO’s performance and succession planning for key management roles; and
Oversight of compensation for the CEO, key executives and the Board, as well as oversight of compensation policies and programs for all employees.
Additional description of the Board’s responsibilities is included in our Corporate Governance Principles document, which is available to stockholders on our website and in print upon request, as described in this proxy statement.
Where can I find more information about the corporate governance practices of VPG?
Various corporate governance related documents are available on our website, including:
Corporate Governance Principles
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
Code of Ethics Applicable to the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer or Controller
Policy Regarding Qualifications of Directors
Audit Committee Charter
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter
Compensation Committee Charter
To view these documents, access our Investor Relations page at http:https://ir.vpgsensors.com and click on “Corporate Governance.”“Governance” and then "Governance Documents." Any of these documents can be obtained in print by any stockholder upon written request to VPG’s investor relations department.
We intend to post any amendments to, or any waivers from, a provision of our Code of Ethics Applicable to the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer or Controller on our website.
What is the composition of our Board of Directors?
VPG has a single class of directors, all of whom are elected annually. The number of directors is fixed by the Board, subject to a maximum of nine directors as provided in the Company’s charter documents. There are currently seveneight members of the Board, but the Board has approved a decrease in the size of the Board to six members effective as of the date of this year's annual meeting.Board. As described in Proposal One, all of our directors with the exception of Dr. Broydo, are nominated to serve for a term expiring at the annual meeting of stockholders in 2017. Dr. Broydo has decided to retire at the end of his term, effective as of the date of this annual meeting, and will not stand for re-election.2025.
Biographical information on each of the directors is included in Proposal One.
How does the Board determine which directors are considered independent?
The Board has determined that, to be considered independent, an outside director may not have a direct or indirect material relationship with VPG. A material relationship is one which impairs or inhibits, or has the potential to impair or inhibit, a director’s exercise of critical and disinterested judgment on behalf of VPG and its stockholders. The materiality standard applied by the Board includes, but is not limited to, the disqualifying relationships set forth in the governance listing standards of the NYSE.

5




Accordingly, the Board has concluded that Janet Clarke, Wesley Cummins, Sejal Shah Gulati, Bruce Lerner, Saul Reibstein and Timothy Talbert and Cary Wood qualify as independent directors. The Audit Committee, the Nominating and
6




Corporate Governance Committee, and the Compensation Committee of the Board are composed entirely of independent directors.
How often did the Board meet during 2015?2023?
The Board met twelveseven times during 2015.2023. In 2015,2023, each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board of Directors and any Committee on which such director served. Fourserved during their period of Board service. All of our then fiveeight directors attended the 20152023 annual meeting of stockholders. It is the policy of the Board that directors are expected to attend the 20162024 Annual Meeting and all future annual meetings of stockholders.
What is the role of the Board’s Committees?
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee - The functions of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee include identifying individuals qualified to become members of the Board; selecting and recommending that the Board approve the director nominees for the next annual meeting of stockholders; developing and recommending to the Board a set of corporate governance principles for VPG; overseeing the evaluation of the Board and the management of VPG; administering VPG’s Related Party Transactions Policy; and performing other related functions specified in the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s charter. A copy of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s charter is available to stockholders on our website and in print upon request.
The chairmanchair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is designated under our Corporate Governance Principles to preside at the executive sessions of the Board’s non-management directors. The current chairmanchair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is Mr. Talbert.
Audit Committee - The functions of the Audit Committee include overseeing VPG’s accounting and financial reporting processes; overseeing the audits of our consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; assisting the Board in its oversight of the integrity of our financial statements, our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the independence and qualifications of our independent registered public accounting firm, and the performance of our internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm; and performing other related functions specified in the Audit Committee’s charter. The Audit Committee consists of three non-management directors, each of whom satisfies the independence requirements of the rules of the SEC and the governance listing requirements of the NYSE. All of the members of the Audit Committee also satisfy the financial literacy requirements of the NYSE and the Board has determined that Mr. Reibstein, the chairmanchair of the Audit Committee, qualifies as an audit committee financial expert under the rules of the SEC. A copy of the Audit Committee’s charter is available to stockholders on our website and in print upon request.
Compensation Committee - The functions of the Compensation Committee include evaluating the performance of the Company’s executive officers and, based on this evaluation, determining and approving the compensation of the executive officers; making recommendations to the Board with respect to, and administering, our incentive compensation plans and equity based compensation plans; and performing other related functions specified in the Compensation Committee’s charter. The Compensation Committee is authorized, within the limits of the Company’s Amended and Restated 20102022 Stock Incentive Program, as amendedPlan (the “2010“2022 Stock Incentive Program”Plan”), to determine the individuals who are to receive awards; the type of awards, including stock, stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units (“RSUs”), and the vesting requirements with respect to those awards, and to administer and interpret the 20102022 Stock Incentive Program. Dr. BroydoPlan. Ms. Clarke is the chairmanchair of thisthe Compensation Committee. A copy of the Compensation Committee’s charter is available to stockholders on our website and in print upon request.
Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight
The Board believes that it is important to retain the flexibility to combine or separate the responsibilities of the offices of Chairman of the Board and CEO, as may be in the best interests of the Company from time to time.
The significant experience of Mr. Marc Zandman,Reibstein, our Chairman, with the Company’s business (as a subsidiary of Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. (“Vishay Intertechnology”) prior to the spin-off)Company and its Board, including his service as chair of the Audit Committee, uniquely qualifies him to serve as the Board’s non-executive Chairman. At the same time, the active membership of our CEO, Mr. Ziv Shoshani, assures our Board of the benefit of his comprehensive knowledge of the Company’s business, day-to-day operations, industry and competitive challenges.

6
7







Management continually monitors the material risks facing the Company, including financial risk, strategic risk, operational risk, corporate governance risk, and legal and compliance risk. The Board is responsible for exercising oversight of management’s identification and management of, and planning for, those risks. Although the Board is ultimately responsible for risk oversight at the Company, the Board has delegated to certain Committees oversight responsibility for those risks that are directly related to their respective areas of focus.
The Audit Committee reviews our policies and guidelines with respect to risk assessment and risk management, including our major financial risk exposures and cybersecurity risks, and oversees the steps management has taken to monitor and control those exposures. For more information regarding oversight of cybersecurity risks, see Item 1C in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, which was filed with the SEC on February 29, 2024 (the “Form 10-K”).

The Compensation Committee considers risk issues when establishing and administering our compensation programs for executive officers and other key personnel.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees corporate governance risks, including matters relating to the composition and organization of the Board and recommends to the Board how its effectiveness can be improved by changes in its composition and organization.
Each of these Committees routinely reports to the Board on the management of these specific risk areas. To permit the Board and its Committees to perform their respective risk oversight roles, individual members of management who supervise the Company’s risk management report directly to the Board or the relevant committee of the Board responsible for overseeing the management of specific risks, as applicable. For this purpose, management has a high degree of access and communication with the Board and its Committees.
The Board believes that open and constructive communication between management and the Board is essential for effective risk management and oversight. Members of the Company’s senior management regularly attend Board and committee meetings and are available to address any questions or concerns raised on matters related to risk management. The Board and its Committees exercise their risk oversight function by carefully evaluating the reports they receive from management and by making inquiries of management with respect to areas of particular interest to the Board.
The following table summarizes the composition of these Committees during 2015:2023 (Ms. Gulati replaced Mr. Reibstein as a member of the Compensation Committee as of January 1, 2024):

Nominating &
Corporate
GovernanceCompensation
NameAudit CommitteeCommitteeCommittee
Marc Zandman
Janet Clarke***
Wesley Cummins
Sejal Gulati
Bruce Lerner*
Saul Reibstein****
Ziv Shoshani
Timothy Talbert****
No. of meetings during 2023612
____________________
8


    Nominating &  
    Corporate  
    Governance Compensation
  Audit Committee Committee Committee
Marc Zandman   
Samuel Broydo * * **
Saul Reibstein ** * *
Timothy Talbert * ** *
Ziv Shoshani   
       
No. of meetings during 2015 10 1 5

____________________

*– Member
**– Chair
*– Member
**– Chairman






7




How does the Board select nominees for the Board?
In selecting candidates for nomination at the annual meeting of our stockholders, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee begins by determining whether the incumbent directors whose terms expire at the meeting desire, and are qualified, to continue their service on the Board. We are of the view that the repeated service of qualified incumbents promotes stability and continuity in the boardroom, giving us the benefit of the familiarity and insight into our affairs that our directors have accumulated during their tenure and contributing to the Board’s ability to work as a collective body. Accordingly, it is the policy of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, absent special circumstances, to nominate qualified incumbent directors who continue to satisfy the Committee’scommittee’s criteria for membership on the Board; who the Committeecommittee believes will continue to make important contributions to the Board; and who consent to stand for re-election and, if re-elected, to continue their service on the Board. If there are Board positions for which the Committeecommittee will not be re-nominating a qualified incumbent, the Committeecommittee will solicit recommendations for nominees from persons who the Committeecommittee believes are likely to be familiar with qualified candidates, including members of the Board and senior management.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may also engage a search firm to assist in identifying qualified candidates. If such a search firm is engaged, the Committeecommittee sets the fees and scope of engagement. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will review and evaluate each candidate who it believes merits serious consideration, taking into account all available information concerning the candidate, the qualifications for Board membership established by the Committee,committee, the existing composition and mix of talent and expertise on the Board and other factors that it deems relevant. In conducting its review and evaluation, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may solicit the views of management and other members of the Board and may, if deemed helpful, conduct interviews of proposed candidates. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will evaluate candidates recommended by stockholders in the same manner as candidates recommended by other persons, except that the Committeecommittee may consider, as one of the factors in its evaluation of stockholder-recommended candidates, the size and duration of the interest of the recommending stockholder or stockholder group in the equity of VPG and whether the stockholders intend to continue holding that interest through the annual meeting date.
What qualifications must a director have?
Under a policy formulated by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, we generally require that all candidates for director:
be persons of integrity and sound ethical character;
be able to represent all stockholders fairly;
have no interests that materially conflict with those of VPG and its stockholders;
have demonstrated professional achievement;
have meaningful management, advisory or policy making experience;
have a general appreciation of the major business issues facing VPG; and
have adequate time to devote to serve on the Board.

A limited exception to some of these requirements, other than the requirements of integrity and ethics and the absence of material conflict, may be made for a holder of substantial voting power. Directors may not stand for re-election after the age of 75 unless the Board makes an affirmative determination that, because of the importance and value of the continued service of a director, the retirement policy should be waived, except that no director may stand for re-election after age 85. This policy does not apply to any person who controls more than 20% of the voting power of the Company. Mr. Talbert and Mr. Reibstein have each reached age 75, and the Board has made an affirmative determination to waive the retirement policy with respect to each of Mr. Talbert and Mr. Reibstein for their respective nomination for re-election at the 2024 Annual Meeting. We also require that a majority of directors
9




be independent; at least three of the directors have the financial literacy necessary for service on the audit committee and at least one of these directors qualifies as an audit committee financial expert; at least some of the independent directors have served as senior executives of public or substantial private companies; and at least some of the independent directors have general familiarity with the major industries in which we operate. Additionally, while the Company does not have a formal policy with respect to the consideration of diversity in identifying director candidates, the benefits of board diversity are considered in the nominations process, including diversity of background and experience. A copy of the Company’s Policy Regarding Qualifications of Directors is available to stockholders on our website.



8




Can I recommend a nominee for director?
Yes. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider recommendations for director nominations submitted by stockholders entitled to vote generally in the election of directors. Submissions must be made in accordance with the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s procedures, as outlined herein and set forth in materials posted on our website. For each annual meeting of our stockholders, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will accept for consideration only one recommendation per stockholder or affiliated group of stockholders. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will only consider candidates who satisfy our minimum qualifications for director, as summarized in this proxy statement and as set forth in materials posted on our website. Stockholders should be aware, as discussed herein, that it is our general policy to re-nominate qualified incumbent directors and that, absent special circumstances, the Committeecommittee will not nominate other candidates when a qualified incumbent director consents to stand for re-election.
A stockholder wishing to recommend to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee a candidate for election as director must submit the recommendation in writing, addressed to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, care of our Corporate Secretary, at Vishay Precision Group, Inc., 3 Great Valley Parkway, Suite 150, Malvern, PA 19355. Submissions must be made by mail, courier, or personal delivery. E-mailed submissions will not be considered. Submissions recommending candidates for election at an annual meeting of stockholders must generally be received no later than 120 calendar days prior to the first anniversary of the date of the proxy statement for the prior annual meeting of stockholders. However, in the event that the date of an annual meeting of stockholders is more than 30 days following the first anniversary date of the annual meeting of stockholders for the prior year, the submission must be made a reasonable time in advance of the mailing of our proxy statement for the current year. Each nominating recommendation must be accompanied by the information called for by our “Procedures for Securityholders’ Submission of Nominating Recommendations,” which is available upon request. This includes specified information concerning the stockholder or group of stockholders making the recommendation and the proposed nominee, any relationships between the recommending stockholder or stockholders and the proposed nominee and the qualifications of the proposed nominee to serve as director. The recommendation must also be accompanied by the consent of the proposed nominee to serve if nominated and elected and the agreement of the nominee to be contacted by the Committee,committee, if the Committeecommittee decides in its discretion to do so.
In addition to being entitled to make a recommendation that the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee nominate a candidate for election as a director, stockholders are also entitled to nominate candidates themselves for election to the Board at a meeting of stockholders, by providing the necessary information by the applicable deadlines. See the discussion under the heading “Stockholder Proposals and Nominations for the 20172025 Annual Meeting” below.
How do stockholders and others communicate with the Board?
VPG stockholders may communicate with the Board, any Committee of the Board or any individual director, and any interested party may communicate with the non-management directors of the Board as a group, by delivering such communications either in writing addressed to our Corporate Secretary at Vishay Precision Group, Inc., 3 Great Valley Parkway, Suite 150, Malvern, PA 19355; or by e-mail to boardofdirectors@vpgsensors.com. Communications should not exceed 1,000 words.
All communications must be accompanied by the following information: (i) if the person submitting the communication is a securityholder, a statement of the type and amount of the securities of VPG that the person holds; (ii) if the person submitting the communication is not a securityholder and is submitting the communication to the non-management directors as an interested party, the nature of the person’s interest in VPG; (iii) any special
10




interest, meaning an interest not in the capacity as a stockholder of VPG, of the person in the subject matter of the communication; and (iv) the address, telephone number and e-mail address, if any, of the person submitting the communication. Communications addressed to directors may, at the direction of the directors, be shared with VPG’s management.



9
11







DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
During 2013,Under the Compensation Committee engaged the services of Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (“Meridian”) to advise the Compensation Committee on compensation matters, including compensation for non-employee directors. Based on input from Meridian, and at the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board adopted the 2014Company's 2017 Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan (the(as amended, the “NEDC Plan”), effective as of the date of the 2014 Annual Meeting. Under the NEDC Plan, concurrent with the 2015 annual meeting, each non-employee director receivedreceives an annual retainer fee of $30,000$40,000 for serving on the Board, excluding the Chairman, who receivedreceives an annual retainer fee of $75,000$90,000 for his service. In addition, under the NEDC Plan, the chairmenchair of the Audit Committee receives an annual retainer of $15,000, and the chairs of the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee receivedeach receive an annual retainer of $10,000 for their services as chairmenchair of their respective committees. Under the NEDC Plan, the retainer fees for the independent directors are paid in equal quarterly installments in advance and beginning with a payment due on the date of the annual meeting. Such annual retainer fees are pro-rated for a partial year of service by a non-employee director elected to the board between annual meetings.
Under the NEDC Plan, each of our non-employee directors other than our Chairman, was granted RSUs worth $40,000$70,000 effective immediately upon histheir election at the 2015 annual meeting. Our Chairman was granted RSUs worth $55,000 effective immediately upon his election at the 20152023 annual meeting. The number of RSUs granted is based on the average closing price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange for the five consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date of grant. These grants will vest on the earlier of the next annual meeting date or May 21, 201624, 2024 (the first anniversary of their grant date), subject to each non-employee director's continued service on the board. The grant-date fair value of RSUs is recognized over the vesting period. For directors appointed between annual meetings, the amount of the stock grant is pro-rated for a partial year of service by the non-employee director and vests on the date of the first annual meeting after the date of grant subject to the director’s continued service on the board.
Our director who is also an employee of VPG (our Chief Executive Officer) did not receive any additional compensation for his service as a director. See the discussion herein under the heading “Executive Compensation.”
The following table provides information with respect to the compensation paid or provided to the Company’s non-management directors during 2015:2023:
 Fees Earned Stock 
 and Awards 
Stock
Awards
Awards
Awards
NameName Paid in Cash (1) Total
Samuel Broydo $40,000 $40,098 $80,098
Name
NameFees Paid(1)Total
Janet Clarke
Wesley Cummins
Sejal Gulati
Bruce Lerner
Saul ReibsteinSaul Reibstein $40,000 $40,098 $80,098
Timothy TalbertTimothy Talbert $40,000 $40,098 $80,098
Marc Zandman (2) $75,000 $55,134 $130,134
Marc Zandman
____________________
(1)
(1)
Each of the directors was granted RSUs in 2015 under the 2010 Stock Incentive Program. The RSUs vest on the first anniversary of the 2015 annual meeting. The grant-date fair value of RSUs is recognized over the vesting period. The amounts presented in the table represent the aggregate grant-date fair value of the RSUs computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and the assumptions as set forth in Note 10 of our consolidated financial statements onin the Form 10-K filed on March 9, 2016.

10-K.
(2)Non-Executive Chairman of the Board.

12




10







PROPOSAL ONE
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
SixEight directors serving on the Board are nominated for re-election, with a term expiring at the annual meeting of stockholders in 2017.2025. Each of the nominees has consented to serve if elected. Dr. Broydo has decided to retire at the end of his term and will not stand for re-election.
If any nominee for director becomes unavailable for election, the proxies will be voted for such substitute nominee(s) as the Board may propose. We have no reason to believe that any of the nominees will be unable or unwilling to serve if elected.
The following table summarizes the Company's current directors:
NameName Age Director SinceNameAgeDirector Since
Samuel Broydo 79 2010
Janet ClarkeJanet Clarke 63 2016Janet Clarke712016
Wesley CumminsWesley Cummins462017
Sejal Shah GulatiSejal Shah Gulati502022
Bruce LernerBruce Lerner582017
Saul ReibsteinSaul Reibstein 67 2010Saul Reibstein752010
Ziv ShoshaniZiv Shoshani 49 2009Ziv Shoshani572009
Timothy TalbertTimothy Talbert 69 2010Timothy Talbert772010
Cary Wood 49 2016
Marc Zandman (1) 54 2010
Marc ZandmanMarc Zandman622010
____________________

(1)Non-Executive Chairman of the Board.
Nominees for Election as Directors – Terms Expiring 20172025
Marc Zandman isserved as the non-executive Chairman of our Board. Board through December 31, 2022. Mr. Zandman was elected ExecutiveChairman of the board of directors of Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. ("Vishay Intertechnology") in 2011 after serving as Vice Chairman for Vishay Intertechnology since 2003; a director of Vishay Intertechnology since 2001; and President of Vishay Israel Ltd. since 1998. In addition to these positions, Mr. Zandman was appointed Chief Business Development Officer of Vishay Intertechnology as of June 2011 and Chief Administration Officer of Vishay Intertechnology as of January 1, 2007; has served as Group Vice President of Vishay Intertechnology Measurements Group from 2002 to 2004; and served in various other capacities with Vishay Intertechnology since 1984.  He is the son of the late Dr. Felix Zandman, the founder and former executive chairmanExecutive Chairman of Vishay Intertechnology.  Mr. Marc Zandman’s dedicated service to Vishay Intertechnology and extensive knowledge of our business give him valuable experience facing issues relevant to our Company.
Ziv Shoshani is our Chief Executive Officer and President, and has been since our spin-off as an independent public company in July, 2010. He also serves on the Board. Mr. Shoshani was Chief Operating Officer of Vishay Intertechnology from January 1, 2007 to November 1, 2009. During 2006, he was Deputy Chief Operating Officer of Vishay Intertechnology. Mr. Shoshani was Executive Vice President of Vishay Intertechnology from 2000 to 2009 with various areas of responsibility, including Executive Vice President of the Capacitors and the Resistors businesses, as well as heading the Measurements Group and Foil Divisions. Mr. Shoshani had been employed by Vishay Intertechnology since 1995. He continues to serve on the Vishay Intertechnology board of directors. Mr. Shoshani is a nephew of Ruta Zandman, the widow of the late Dr. Felix Zandman, the founder of Vishay Intertechnology. Mr. Shoshani’s long-standing dedication to our Company, exemplified by his extensive management experience and experience on the Vishay Intertechnology board of directors, provides him with valuable insight into the business and the operation of our Company and makes him a valuable advisor to the Board.






11




Janet M. Clarke. Ms. Clarke is the founder of Clarke Littlefield LLC, a marketing technologies advisory firm, and has served as its President since June 2003. Prior to founding Clarke Littlefield, she served in executive and management roles at DealerTrack, Inc., a privately held automotive finance technology services company; KnowledgeBase Marketing, a subsidiary of Young and Rubicam, Inc.; and Citibank for Citigroup’s consumer business. Ms. Clarke has served as a director for Cox Enterprises, Inc., a private company, since 2007, where she also serves as Chair of the Compensation Committee and as a member of the Audit Committee. Ms. Clarke served as a director for Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (NYSE: ABG) from April 2005 until April 2015, where she also
13




served as a member of the Audit Committee from April 2005 to January 2009 and from October 2012 to May 2014; as a member of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee from April 2005, and was appointed Chair of the Committeecommittee in August 2006, to April 2015; and as a member of the Governance Committee from November 2006 to April 2015. Ms. Clarke was also a director and a member of the Audit Committee and the Chair of the Compensation Committee of ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: XJT) from 2001-2011.2001 to 2011. Ms. Clarke earned a Bachelor Degree in Architecture from Princeton University and has completed the Advanced Management Program at the Harvard Business School. Ms. Clarke offers significant business experience to our Board, particularly in the areas of marketing and marketing technology, as a result of the various executive and management positions she has held in corporations of various sizes. In addition, given the public and private company directorships that she has held during her career, Ms. Clarke has a broad range of experience as a director and a deep understanding of board oversight and the exercise of appropriate diligence, which makes her a valuable addition to the VPG Board.

Wesley Cummins. Wes Cummins currently serves as the CEO and Chairman of Applied Digital Corp. (NASDAQ: APLD) and is one of that company’s cofounders. Mr. Cummins was also the founder and CEO of 272 Capital LP, a registered investment advisor, which focused primarily on investing in technology hardware, software and services companies. Mr. Cummins sold 272 Capital LP to B. Riley Financial (NASDAQ: RILY) in 2021. Following the sale, he joined B. Riley as President of B. Riley Asset Management, the institutional asset management arm of B. Riley. In late 2023, Mr. Cummins subsequently resigned from B Riley Financial and repurchased 272 Capital LP. Mr. Cummins has been a technology investor for over 20 years and held various positions in capital markets including positions at investment banks and institutional asset management firms. Prior to founding 272 Capital, Mr. Cummins led technology investing at Nokomis Capital, L.L.C., an investment advisory firm. Mr. Cummins serves as a member of the Board of Sequans Communications S.A. (NYSE: SQNS), a fabless designer, developer and supplier of cellular semiconductor solutions for massive, broadband and critical Internet of Things (IoT) markets. Mr. Cummins holds a BSBA from Washington University in St. Louis where he majored in finance and accounting. Mr. Cummins’s experience in investment banking and capital markets lends a valuable perspective to the VPG Board.

Sejal Shah Gulati. Ms. Gulati served as the Chief Growth Officer at NOW™, a B2B payments start-up that helps businesses accelerate invoice payments, from October 2021 to February 2024. From January 2021 to October 2021, Ms. Gulati served as Senior Vice President and Growth Leader at Genpact Limited, a NYSE-listed global services firm focused on delivering digital transformation for hundreds of Fortune 500 companies. From 2017 to 2020, she served as General Manager and Vice President of Global Commercial Services for American Express. From 2016 to 2017, Ms. Gulati served as Chief Marketing Officer for EZETAP, a venture-funded start-up company that facilitated B2B payments. Prior to founding and serving from 2006 to 2016 as Chief Executive Officer of Time Inc. India/TAS Analytical Services, a media analytics company serving Time Inc. and Time Warner, Ms. Gulati was the Director of Sales and Marketing for a number of Time Inc. publications, where she earned several industry awards for innovation. Ms. Gulati earned her Bachelor of Arts degree from Princeton University and an MBA from Harvard Business School. She previously served as a Trustee of Princeton University and was the President of the Harvard Business School Alumni Board. Ms. Gulati’s expertise in digital marketing and business management lend a valuable perspective to the VPG Board.

Dr. Bruce Lerner. Dr. Lerner has served as President and CEO of Norit Corp. a materials science company manufacturing carbon materials, since May 2022. From 2020 to May 2022, he served as President of HollyFrontier Lubricants and Specialty Products, a division of HF Sinclair Corporation. From 2014 to 2020, he was President and CEO of PeroxyChem, LLC, a global specialty chemicals company. From 2007 to 2014, he served as Vice President and Global Business Head with FMC Peroxygens. From 1993 through 2007, he held several positions in R&D, Marketing, and Management, including SBU General Management, with Engelhard Corp and, post-acquisition, BASF Corporation. Dr. Lerner holds a Bachelor of Science degree from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Master of Science degree in Industrial Chemistry from the University of Central Florida, and Ph.D. in Inorganic Chemistry from Northwestern University. Dr. Lerner’s operating experience as a president and CEO of global companies, combined with his technology expertise and extensive international business experience, allows him to provide significant contribution to the VPG Board.

Saul V. Reibstein. Mr. Reibstein ishas served as the non-executive Chairman of our Board since January 1, 2023. From December 1, 2013 to December 31, 2016, he served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Penn National Gaming, Inc. (NASDAQ: PENN), now PENN Entertainment, Inc. ("PENN") where he also served on the board of directors and as chairman of the audit committee from June 2011 until his appointment as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in November 2013.  Mr. Reibstein was employed as an
14




executive advisor by PENN during 2017, after which he retired. Effective March 21, 2018, Mr. Reibstein was again appointed to the board of directors of PENN where he also serves on the audit and compensation committees. From 2004 until joining Penn National GamingPENN Entertainment, Inc. as an executive, Mr. Reibstein served as a member of the senior management team of CBIZ, Inc., a New York Stock Exchange-listed professional services company, where, as Executive Managing Director, he was responsible for the management of the CBIZ New York City Financial Services office operations and the overall international activities of the Financial Services Group. Mr. Reibstein is the majority owner of S3 Living, formally named NCP Ventures, LLC, an independent advisory service for senior citizens, helping them to identify, select and negotiate the transition to Continuing Care Retirement Communities and 55 and Over Communities. Mr. Reibstein has over 40 years of public accounting experience, including 11 years serving as a partner in BDO Seidman, a national accounting services firm, where he was the partner in charge of the Philadelphia office from June 1997 to December 2001 and Regional Business Line Leader from December 2001 until September 2004. Mr. Reibstein is a licensed CPA in Pennsylvania and received a Bachelor of Business Administration from Temple University. Mr. Reibstein qualifies as an audit committee financial expert satisfying the rules of the SEC. Mr. Reibstein’s qualification as an audit committee financial expert, as well as his extensive experience as a public accounting partner, make him highly qualified to serve both as a director of our company and a financial expert on the Audit Committee. Mr. Reibstein also has relevant, long-standing experience as a manager of an NYSE-listed company that he will draw upon in advising us with respect to our listing and filing compliance.
Timothy V. Talbert. Mr. Talbert has served as Senior Vice President of Credit and Originations for Lease Corporation of America (“LCA”), a national equipment lessor, sincefrom July 2000 to the end of 2018, and President of the LCA Bank Corporation, a bank that augments LCA’s funding capacity, sincefrom its founding in January 2006.2006 to the end of 2018. He has retired from both of these positions. Previously, Mr. Talbert was Senior Vice President and Director of Asset Based Lending and Equipment Leasing of Huntington National Bank from 1997 to 2000; and prior to that, served in a variety of positions with Comerica Bank for more than 25 years. Mr. Talbert also serves as a director of Vishay Intertechnology. Mr. Talbert previously served on the board of directors and was a member of the audit committee of Siliconix incorporated,Incorporated, a NASDAQ-listed manufacturer of power semiconductors of which Vishay Intertechnology owned an 80.4% interest, from 2001 until Vishay Intertechnology acquired the noncontrolling interests in 2005. Mr. Talbert received a Bachelor’s Degree in Economics from University of the Pacific and an MBA from the University of Notre Dame. Mr. Talbert’s previous service as a director and member of the audit and compensation committees of a publicly traded company, as well as his current service on the board of another publicly traded company, allows him to bring an important perspective to the Board. Additionally, Mr. Talbert’s prior service as the president of a federally regulated institution gives him relevant understanding of compliance with complex regulations and current accounting rules adding invaluable expertise to our Board.




12




Cary B. Wood. Mr. Wood served as Chief Executive Officer and director of Sparton Corporation (NYSE: SPA) from November 2008 until February 2016 and as President from April 2009 until February 2016. From August 2004 to November 2008, Mr. Wood served in several roles, including interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer, for Citation Corporation (now known as Grede Holdings, LLC), a private company manufacturing cast, machined and assembled components for the transportation and industrial markets. In March 2007, Citation Corporation filed for voluntary reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Mr. Wood began his career with General Motors Corporation, followed by United Technologies Corporation, where he served in a variety of general management, operations and engineering roles. Mr. Wood received a Bachelor of Science in Technology from Purdue University in 1989, a Master of Science in Industrial Operations in the School of Management from Lawrence Tech University in 1995, and an MBA in Finance from Loyola University-Chicago in 2014. Mr. Wood’s experience in executive management, as well as his engineering expertise and public company board experience, make him highly qualified to serve as a director.






The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR ALL” the nominees for election as directors.






13
15







REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
 
Management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, for assessing the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and for preparing our consolidated financial statements. Our independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for, among other things, performing an independent audit of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and issuing a report thereon. It is the responsibility of the Audit Committee to monitor and oversee these processes.
In fulfilling its oversight duties, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management and our independent registered public accounting firm Ernstfor the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, Brightman Almagor Zohar & Young LLP,Co., a firm in the Deloitte global network ("Brightman Almagor Zohar & Co."), (a) the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015,2023, (b) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, and (c) the other matters required to be discussed under Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, Communications with Audit Committees, as amended and as adopted bythe applicable requirements of the PCAOB in Rule 3200T.and the SEC. These required communications addressed, among other topics, the independent registered public accounting firm’s responsibility under the standards of the PCAOB; critical accounting policies and practices; judgments and accounting estimates; alternative accounting treatments; any significant audit adjustments; any disagreements or difficulties encountered in performing the audit; and other material communications between the independent registered public accounting firm and management. The Audit Committee received from the independent auditors written disclosures regarding the auditor’s independence required by PCAOB Ethics and Independence Rule 3526, Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence, and has discussed with the independent auditors, the independent auditor’s independence. The Audit Committee also considered the compatibility of non-audit services provided to VPG by ErnstBrightman Almagor Zohar & Young LLP,Co., the member firms of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited and their related entities, and the fees and costs billed or to be billed for these services, with the maintenance of the independent registered public accounting firm’s independence. The Committee has concluded that the provision of the non-audit services by ErnstBrightman Almagor Zohar & Young LLPCo., the member firms of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited and their related entities in 20152023 did not impair the independent registered public accounting firm’s independence. Under the Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy that wasas adopted by the Audit Committee, in July 2010, the Audit Committee must pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided to VPG by the independent registered public accounting firm. The policy sets forth the procedures and conditions for pre-approval of these services. All of the audit and non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm since adoption of the Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy were pre-approved by the Committee in accordance with such policy.
Based upon this review and discussions with management and the independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that our audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20152023 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Audit Committee has also appointed ErnstBrightman Almagor Zohar & Young LLPCo. as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2016,2024, but the Committee has determineddecided to submit the appointment for ratification by stockholders (see Proposal Two).


Respectfully submitted,
 
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors
 
Saul Reibstein, Chairman
Dr. Samuel Broydo
Chair
Janet Clarke
Timothy Talbert
 
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of our previous or future filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), that might incorporate this proxy statement or futurein such filings with the SEC, in whole or in part, the above report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or “filed” with the SEC and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any such filing.

1416







PROPOSAL TWO
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF
INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Audit Committee of the Board is responsible for the selection of our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee has determined to reappoint the public accounting firm of ErnstBrightman Almagor Zohar & Young LLPCo., a firm in the Deloitte global network ("Brightman Almagor Zohar & Co."), as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016,2024, as well as to audit the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. ErnstBrightman Almagor Zohar & Young LLPCo. has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since the spin-off from Vishay Intertechnology.2019. Although stockholder approval for the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm is not required, we are submitting the selection of the independent registered public accounting firm to stockholders for their ratification.
Representatives of the firm of ErnstBrightman Almagor Zohar & Young LLPCo. are expected to be present at the 20162024 Annual Meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.
Under the Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy that wasas adopted by the Audit Committee, in July 2010, the Audit Committee must pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided to VPG by the independent registered public accounting firm. The policy sets forth the procedures and conditions for pre-approval of these services. The Audit Committee has pre-approved generally the engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm for services relating to our filings with the SEC (including comfort letters, comment letters and consents for securities offerings); acquisition or disposition related diligence activities; internal control review and compliance; interpretation and compliance with accounting and accounting-related disclosure rules and standards; certain attest services; domestic and international tax planning and compliance; and risk management.
The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed by ErnstBrightman Almagor Zohar & Young LLP for auditCo., the member firms of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited and non-audit services rendered to VPGtheir related entities in 20152023 and 2014.2022. These fees are categorized as audit fees, audit-related fees, tax fees, and all other fees. The nature of the services provided in each category is described following the table.
20232022
Audit fees$1,890,768 $1,765,559 
Audit-related fees— — 
Tax fees50,116 66,662 
All other fees3,79025,102 
Total fees$1,944,674 $1,857,323 
____________________
 2015 2014
Audit fees$2,218,000 $1,895,000
Audit-related fees -  -
Tax fees 115,000  272,000
All other fees 2,000  2,000
Total fees$2,335,000 $2,169,000
____________________     
Audit fees. These fees generally consist of professional services rendered for the audits of the consolidated financial statements of VPG, quarterly reviews, subsidiary or equity investmentstatutory audits, issuance of consents, and assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC.
Audit-related fees. These fees generally consist of assurance and other services related to the performance of the audit or review of VPG’s financial statements or that are traditionally performed by the independent registered public accounting firm, and consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards.
Tax fees. These fees relate primarily to tax compliance, including review and preparation of corporate tax returns, assistance with tax audits, review of the tax treatment for certain expenses, and taxtax-related due diligence relating to acquisitions.diligence. They also include fees for state and local tax planning and consultations with respect to various domestic and international tax matters.
All other fees. These fees generally consist of reviews for compliance with various government regulations, risk management and treasury reviews, assessments and audits of various contractual arrangements, consulting services and subscription to online accounting research tools.

15
17







In 2015,2023, VPG did not make use of the rule that waives pre-approval requirements for non-audit services in certain cases if the fees for these services constitute less than 5% of the total fees paid to the independent registered public accounting firm during the year.



The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR”
the ratification of the appointment of ErnstBrightman Almagor Zohar & Young LLPCo. as our independent registered
public accounting firm for the year ending 
December 31, 2016.2024.




16
18







SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN

BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
On April 4, 2016,March 25, 2024, VPG had outstanding 12,152,80312,362,918 shares of common stock, each of which entitles the holder to one vote, and 1,025,1581,022,887shares of Class B common stock, each of which entitles the holder to 10 votes. Voting is not cumulative. The following table shows the number of shares of VPG common stock and Class B common stock beneficially owned by (a) each director and director nominee, (b) each “Named Executive Officer” identified under “Executive Compensation,” (c) the directors and executive officers of VPG as a group and (d) any person owning more than 5% of VPG common stock or the Class B common stock.
Common StockClass B Common Stock
Right to
Acquire
RestrictedOwnership
Stock UnitsUnder
ScheduledOptions
to vestExercisable
 Shares of
within 60within 60PercentSharesPercent ofVoting
NameStock (1)daysdaysof Classof StockClassPower (2)
Directors and Named Executive Officers
Marc Zandman15,645(3)1,989-*615,593(4)60.2 %27.1 %
Ziv Shoshani230,395(3)--1.9 %615,487(5)60.2 %28.0 %
Saul V. Reibstein19,3111,989-*-
Timothy V. Talbert20,8821,989-*-
Janet Clarke14,1411,989-*-
Bruce Lerner12,3981,989-*-
Wesley Cummins7,8961,989-*-
William M. Clancy34,162--*-
Amir Tal10,812--*-
Sejal Shah Gulati2,9571,989-*
All Directors and Executive Officers
as a group (10 Persons)365,58913,923-3.1 %615,59360.2 %28.7 %
c/o Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
3 Great Valley Parkway, Suite 150
Malvern, PA 19355
Mrs. Ruta Zandman3,010(3)*787,096(6)76.9 %34.5 %
c/o Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.
63 Lancaster Avenue
Malvern, PA 19355
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP (7)992,0258.0 %4.4 %
Palisades West, Building One
6300 Bee Cave Road
Austin, TX 78746
19




  Common Stock Class B Common Stock  
      Right to          
      Acquire          
    Restricted Ownership          
    Stock Units Under          
    Scheduled Options          
    to vest Exercisable          
  
 Shares of
 within 60 within 60 Percent Shares Percent of Voting
Name Stock (1) days days of Class of Stock Class Power (2)
Directors and Executive Officers                
Marc Zandman 14,575 4,180 - *  615,593(3)60.0%  27.6%
Ziv Shoshani 120,639 - 18,826 *  615,487(4)60.0%  28.1%
Samuel Broydo 7,127 3,040 - *  -     
Saul V. Reibstein 7,127 3,040 - *  -     
Timothy V. Talbert 7,198 3,040 - *  -     
Cary Wood - 525 - *  -     
Janet Clarke - 417 - *  -     
William M. Clancy 17,631 - - *  -     
Thomas P. Kieffer 19,327 - - *  -     
Roland B. Desilets - - -    -     
                 
All Directors and Executive Officers                
as a group (10 Persons) 193,624 14,242 18,826    615,593 60.0%  28.5%
c/o Vishay Precision Group, Inc.                
3 Great Valley Parkway, Suite 150                
Malvern, PA 19355                
                 
Mrs. Ruta Zandman 3,010(5)    *  787,096(6)76.8%  35.1%
c/o Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.                
63 Lancaster Avenue                
Malvern, PA 19355                
                 
Nokomis Capital, L.L.C. (7) 1,629,845     13.4%       7.3%
2305 Cedar Springs Rd. , Suite 420                
Dallas, TX 75201                
                 
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP (8) 1,054,652     8.7%       4.7%
Palisades West, Building One                
6300 Bee Cave Road                
Austin, TX 78746                
BlackRock Inc. (8)1,003,2948.1 %4.4 %
55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10022
Royce & Associates, LP (9)883,1417.1 %3.9 %
745 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10151
The Vanguard Group (10)643,8705.2 %2.8 %
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355
Eugenia A. Ames (11)91,1618.9 %4.0 %
c/o Mr. Leroy Rachlin
Janney Montgomery Scott
780 Route 37 West, Suite 130
Toms River, NJ 08755
Deborah S. Larkin59,0165.8 %2.6 %
c/o Mr. Bruce Auerbach
World Financial Center
270 Madison Avenue, Suite 1503
New York, NY 10016
Barbara J. Winslow51,8735.1 %2.3 %
90 Eighth Avenue, Apt. 8B
Brooklyn, NY 11213

____________________
17
20





                 
                 
BlackRock Inc. (9) 851,740     7.0%       3.8%
40 East 52nd Street
                
New York, NY 10022                
                 
Royce & Associates, LLC (10) 807,668     6.6%       3.6%
745 Fifth Avenue                
New York, NY 10151                
                 
Harvey Partners, LLC (11) 767,500     6.3%       3.4%
551 Fifth Avenue, 36th Floor                
New York, NY 10176                
                 
Shufro, Rose & Co., LLC (12) 627,235     5.2%       2.8%
745 Fifth Avenue, 26th Floor                
New York, NY 10151                
                 
Eugenia A. Ames (13)          91,161 8.9%  4.1%
c/o Mr. Leroy Rachlin                
Janney Montgomery Scott                
780 Route 37 West, Suite 130                
Toms River, NJ 08755                
                 
Deborah S. Larkin          59,016 5.8%  2.6%
c/o Mr. Bruce Auerbach                
World Financial Center                
270 Madison Avenue, Suite 1503                
New York, NY 10016                
                 
Barbara J. Winslow          51,873 5.1%  2.3%
90 Eighth Avenue, Apt. 8B                
Brooklyn, NY 11213                
____________________

18





*
*Represents less than 1% of the outstanding shares of such class or the total voting power, as the case may be.
(1)In addition to the amounts shown, each share of Class B common stock held by such holder, if applicable, may be converted into one share of common stock upon the election of such holder.
(2)The percentage of total voting power represents voting power with respect to all shares of common stock and Class B common stock, as a single class, calculated on the basis of 10 votes per share of Class B common stock and one vote per share of common stock.
(3)Includes 3,010 shares of common stock held in a family trust, of which Mrs. Ruta Zandman, Mr. Marc Zandman, and Mr. Ziv Shoshani are co-trustees and have shared voting power.
(4)Includes 615,487 shares of Class B common stock held in a family trust, of which Mrs. Ruta Zandman, Mr. Marc Zandman, and Mr. Ziv Shoshani are joint trusteesco-trustees and have shared voting power; 53 shares of Class B common stock directly owned by Mr. Zandman; and 53 shares of Class B common stock owned by Mr. Zandman’s child.
(4)(5)Includes 615,487 shares of Class B common stock held in a family trust, of which Mrs. Ruta Zandman, Mr. Marc Zandman, and Mr. Ziv Shoshani are joint trusteesco-trustees and have shared voting power.
(5)Includes 3,010 shares of common stock held by the estate of Dr. Felix Zandman, of which Ruta Zandman is the named executrix, and as such, exercises sole voting control.
(6)Includes 615,487 shares of Class B common stock held in a family trust, of which Mrs. Ruta Zandman, Mr. Marc Zandman, and Mr. Ziv Shoshani are joint trusteesco-trustees and have shared voting power;power. Pursuant to an agreement relating to the family trust, each of Mrs. Zandman and Messrs. Zandman and Shoshani is required to cause shares controlled by the trust to be voted in support of the election of Mr. Zandman and Mr. Shoshani as directors of the Company. Also includes 171,609 shares of Class B common stock held by third parties and that are subject to a voting agreement pursuant to which Mrs. Zandman ashas the Zandman Representative, maypower to direct the voting of such shares, to the extent that, and in the same manner as, a majority of shares of Class B Common Stock held by Mrs. Zandman, Dr. Zandman’s estate, and their respective “permitted transferees” (as such term is defined in the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation) are voted on such matter.shares.
(7)Based on information provided in a Schedule 13D filed on February 25, 2016 by Nokomis Capital, L.L.C. and subsequent Section 16 filings (collectively, the "Nokomis Filings".) According to the Nokomis Filings, Nokomis Capital, L.L.C. and Brett Hendrickson share the power to vote and to dispose of 1,629,845 shares of common stock.
(8)Based on information provided in a Schedule 13G/A filed on February 9, 201614, 2024 by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP. According to the Schedule 13G/A, Dimensional Fund Advisors LP, in its capacity as an investment advisor, may be deemed to have the sole power to vote or to direct the vote with respect to 1,023,932977,082 shares of common stock and may also be deemed to have the sole power to dispose of 1,054,652992,025 shares of common stock.
(9)(8)Based on information provided in a Schedule 13G/A filed on January 27, 201625, 2024 by BlackRock, Inc. According to the Schedule 13G/A, BlackRock, Inc. may be deemed to have sole power to vote or direct the vote with respect to 815,876979,201 shares of common stock and may also be deemed to have the sole power to dispose or direct the disposition with respect to 851,7401,003,294 shares of common stock.
(10)(9)Based on information provided in a Schedule 13G/A filed on January 28, 201630, 2024 by Royce & Associates, LLC.LP. According to the Schedule 13G/A Royce & Associates, LLC has the sole powerLP may be deemed to vote or direct the vote, and to dispose or direct the disposition, with respect to, 807,668 shares of common stock.
(11)Based on information provided in a Schedule 13G filed on February 16, 2016 by Harvey Partners, LLC. According to the Schedule 13G, Harvey Partners, LLC hashave sole power to vote or direct the vote with respect to 767,500883,141 shares of common stock.
(12)Based on information provided in a Schedule 13G filed on January 22, 2016 by Shufro, Rose & Co., LLC. Accordingstock and may also be deemed to have the Schedule 13G, Shufro, Rose & Co., LLC has sole power to dispose or direct the disposition with respect to 627,235883,141 shares of common stock.
(13)(10)Based on information provided in a Schedule 13G/A filed on February 13, 2024 by The Vanguard Group. According to the Schedule 13G/A The Vanguard Group may be deemed to have sole power to vote or direct the vote with respect to — shares of common stock and may also be deemed to have the sole power to dispose or direct the disposition with respect to 624,771 shares of common stock.
(11)Includes 91,161 shares of Class B common stock that are subject to a voting agreement pursuant to which Mrs. Ruta Zandman as the Zandman Representative, may direct the voting of such shares.



Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our directors and executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of our common stock to report their ownership of, and transactions in, our stock in filings with the SEC. Copies of these reports are also required to be supplied to VPG. VPG believes, based solely on a review of the copies of such reports received, that our directors and executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of our common stock complied with all applicable Section 16(a) reporting requirements during the year ended December 31, 2015.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
No member of the Compensation Committee was at any time during 20152023 an officer or employee of VPG or any of the Company’s subsidiaries nor was any such person a former officer of VPG or any of the Company’s subsidiaries. In addition, no Compensation Committee member is an executive officer of another entity at which one of the Company’s executive officers serves on the board of directors.



1921





COMPANY MANAGEMENT

Named Executive Officers

The Company's Named Executive Officers ( the "NEOs") are as follows:

Named Executive OfficerAgePosition
Ziv Shoshani57President and Chief Executive Officer
William M. Clancy61Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Amir Tal54Executive Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer

Mr. Shoshani’s bio is included in the section herein titled “Nominees for Election as Directors – Terms Expiring 2025”.
William M. Clancy is our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Clancy was Corporate Controller of Vishay Intertechnology from 1993 until November 1, 2009. He became a Vice President of Vishay Intertechnology in 2001 and a Senior Vice President of Vishay Intertechnology in 2005. Mr. Clancy served as Corporate Secretary of Vishay Intertechnology from 2006 to 2009. From June 16, 2000 until May 16, 2005 (the date Vishay Intertechnology acquired the noncontrolling interest in Siliconix incorporated), Mr. Clancy served as the principal accounting officer of Siliconix. Mr. Clancy had been employed by Vishay Intertechnology since 1988. Mr. Clancy is a licensed CPA in Pennsylvania.
Amir Tal is our Executive Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer. Mr. Tal was appointed by the Board of Directors to such position effective March 1, 2024. From February 5, 2020 until February 29, 2024 he served as the Company's Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer. He served as the Company’s Senior Vice President, Finance from March 2017 until February 2020. From July 2010 to February 2017, Mr. Tal served as the Company’s Vice President Operational Controller and Regional Controller Israel. Mr. Tal holds a bachelor’s degree in economics and business administration from the University of Haifa and an MBA from Bar Ilan University.
Corporate Officers

The Company's corporate officers (who are not "executive officers" as defined in Exchange Act Rule 3b-7) are as follows:

Corporate OfficerAgePosition
Yaron Kadim59Senior Vice President, Division Head - VPG Foil Resistors
Oded Sherman55Vice President, Division Head – Measurement Systems
Rafi Ouzan58Senior Vice President, Division Head – Weighing Solutions

Yaron Kadim is our Senior Vice President, Division Head – Foil Resistors. From 2010 to 2022, Mr. Kadim was Vice President, Division Head of three Foil Resistors brands: VFR, Alpha Electronics, and Powertron. Mr. Kadim served as Vice President, Division Head – Foil Resistors Operations for Vishay Intertechnology from 2004 to 2010. From 1993 to 2004, Mr. Kadim served in various positions with Vishay Intertechnology, including as Director of R&D and Engineering, Resistors Division. From 1983 to 1988, Mr. Kadim served as a Major in the Israeli Defense Forces. Mr. Kadim holds a bachelor's degree in electronics materials engineering, and an MBA, each, from Ben-Gurion University.
Oded Sherman is our Vice President, Division Head – Measurements Systems. Prior to joining VPG in July 2022, Mr. Sherman was General Manager of Nanomotion Ltd., a company that manufactured precision motion subsystems, and a subsidiary of Johnson Electric, from July 2018 to June 2022. From 2013 to 2018, Mr. Sherman was Senior Director, Service Business Unit Head of Applied Materials, Inc. Mr. Sherman holds a bachelor's degree
22






in physics and material engineering from Ben-Gurion University, and a master's degree in science and technology commercialization from the University of Texas.
Rafi Ouzan is our Senior Vice President, Division Head – Weighing Solutions. From 2010 to 2022, Mr. Ouzan served as our Vice President, Force Sensors Division. Mr. Ouzan served as Vice President, Force Sensors Division for Vishay Intertechnology from 2008 to 2010. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Ouzan served in various positions with Vishay Intertechnology in the Inductors, Load Cell, and Force Sensors divisions, including as Vice President, Operations and Operations Manager, Load Cell Division. Mr. Ouzan holds a bachelor's degree in material engineering and an MBA, each, from Ben-Gurion University.
23




EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the Company’s executive compensation program and explains how the Compensation Committee made compensation decisions for our Named Executive Officers (the “NEOs”) who are identified below:
Named Executive OfficerPosition
Ziv ShoshaniPresident and Chief Executive Officer
William M. ClancyExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Amir TalExecutive Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
Compensation Philosophy Generallyand Objectives
Our executive compensation packages, including severance benefits, areprogram is designed to assist us in recruiting, retaining and motivating key employees who can function effectively both in periods of recessionour NEOs and economic strength, and provideproviding our executivesNEOs with an appropriate level of job security,compensation, commensurate with their contributions to the Company and their tenure.Company. The Compensation Committee believes that the elements of our executive compensation program, as well as the mix of these elements in relation to total compensation, reward intrinsically sound management decisions and do not encourage undue risk taking to enhance short-term profitability at the expense of the long-term financial health and viability of the enterprise.Company. The Compensation Committee seeks to mitigate any compensation-related risk by:
providing a meaningful portion of total compensation in the form of equity incentives that are earned over multiple years (to encourage an appropriatelya long-term focus); and
capping annual cash bonuses for named executive officersour NEOs at 200% of base salary for Mr. Shoshani, 80%at 105% of base salary for Mr. Clancy, 60% of base salaryand at 75% for Mr. Kieffer, and 40% of base salary for Mr. DesiletsTal (to provide appropriate balance between short- and long-term objectives).
Please see the discussion below under the headings “Performance Bonus” and “Equity Compensation” for further detail regarding performance bonus and long-term equity incentive targets.
Considerations for Setting 2023 Compensation
The Compensation Committee believesconsidered a number of factors when setting each NEO’s compensation, including competitive market data derived from our peer group, individual and Company performance, and the NEO’s role and responsibilities. The Compensation Committee reviewed competitive market data that this mixwas derived from our 2023 compensation peer group, which is composed of long-term equity incentive compensation and shorter-term performance bonus opportunity discourages excessive risk-taking in the short term and rewards appropriate focus on achievement of both short-term and long-term objectives.following companies:
Evolution of Executive Compensation
Badger Meter, Inc.Mercury Systems, Inc.
CSW Industrials, Inc.Onto Innovation Inc.
CTS Corp.Hurco Companies, Inc.
Daktronics Inc.Luna Innovations, Inc.
FARO Technologies Inc.Amtech Systems, Inc.
ESCO Technologies Inc.nFlight, Inc.

The Company’sCompensation Committee did not align NEOs’ compensation packages historically have combined base salary with an opportunity for annual cash bonuses and long-term equity awards in order to aligna particular benchmark level but considered pay data as one point of reference when setting NEO compensation.
Role of the interests of senior management with the long-term interests of our stockholders.Compensation Consultant
During 2013, and after confirmingAs permitted under its independence pursuant to the recently adopted New York Stock Exchange listing standards,charter, the Compensation Committee engaged the services ofretained Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (“Meridian”) to advise it regarding executive and non-employee director compensation.as its independent compensation consultant for 2023. In the course of its engagement,particular, Meridian developed, andadvised the Compensation Committee approved, a customon our compensation peer group of public companies that were, at the time of Meridian's review, similar to the Company in terms of industry, revenues, and scope of international operations. This peer group consisted of:
Badger Meter Inc.Measurement Specialties Inc.
CTS Corp.Mercury Systems Inc.
Daktronics Inc.MTS Systems Corp.
Electro Scientific Industries Inc.Park Electrochemical Corp.
FabrinetRadisys Corp.
Faro Technologies Inc.Reald Inc.
GSI Group Inc.Rofin Sinar Technologies Inc.
Maxwell Technologies Inc.Zygo Corp
The Compensation Committee reviewed average and median data for various types of cash and equity compensation within the group. Meridian provided the Compensation Committee with input concerning potential changes to the compensation packages of the executive officers, particularly with respect to increasing performance-based equity-based compensation as a percentage of total compensation, particularly for the Company’s Chief Financial Officer.
As a resultan assessment of the compensation data and input received from Meridian, the Compensation Committee (and the Board, with respect to Mr. Clancy) approved amendments to the employment agreements of Messrs. Shoshani and Clancy, which became effective on January 1, 2014, providing for increased base salaries, and increased targets for annual performance bonuses and long-term equity incentive awards (in each case, measured as a percentage of base salary). See the discussion under the heading “Employment Agreements” below.

20




In the fourth quarter of 2015, Mr. Roland B. Desilets was appointed an executive officer of the Company, with the titleour Senior Vice President General Counsel and Secretary. Subsequent to that appointment, the Committee approved an employment agreement for Mr. Desilets on January 20, 2016 that included an equity grant and severance terms.Chief Accounting Officer against peer group practices.
Also in the fourth quarter of 2015, we entered into an amended and restated employment agreement (the “Amended Employment Agreement”) with Mr. Kieffer, pursuant to which, effective January 1, 2016, Mr. Kieffer ceased to be an executive officer of the Company and he assumed the role of Chief Engineer, Resistive Foil Technology.
24
Performance Philosophy


Our compensation philosophy is intended to dovetail with our philosophy regarding evaluation of operating performance.
The performance bonuses and long-term equity incentive awards for our executive officers are based on achievement of objectives determined annually by the Compensation Committee. Mr. Shoshani’s and Mr. Clancy’s 2015 performance bonuses were based on two measures of Company performance: adjusted operating margin and adjusted EBITDA.
Adjusted operating margin and adjusted EBITDA mean, respectively, operating margin and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, in each case determined in accordance with U.S. GAAPand adjusted to exclude various items that are not indicative of the intrinsic operating performance of our business, including restructuring and related severance costs, fixed asset or inventory write-downs and related purchase commitment charges, impairment charges for goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible assets, and individually material one-time gains or charges. The Board determined that each of adjusted EBITDA and adjusted operating margin for 2015 excluded the impact of $4,942,000 in goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible impairment charges, $4,461,000 in restructuring costs, $185,000 in acquisition costs related to the acquisition of Stress-Tek, Inc. in 2015, and $172,000 in purchase accounting adjustments relating to the acquisition of the George Kelk Corporation business recorded during 2015.
Pursuant to the Amended Employment Agreement with Mr. Kieffer, Mr. Kieffer was paid a 2015 performance bonus equal to the target performance bonus amount provided for under his prior employment agreement with us.
In 2016, the annual performance bonuses for Messrs. Shoshani, Clancy and Desilets will be based on adjusted operating margin and adjusted EBITDA, as determined by the Compensation Committee.
Each officer’s long term equity incentive award is subject to a three-year cliff vesting period beginning on January 1 of the year of grant. Further, the vesting of 75% of each executive officer’s long-term equity award is subject to achievement of certain performance criteria determined by the Compensation Committee in connection with the grant. The relevant performance period for each long-term equity incentive award is the three-year vesting period applicable to such award.
The Compensation Committee in consultation withdetermined that the Chairmanwork performed by Meridian did not give rise to a conflict of the Board, undertakes an annual reviewinterest and that Meridian was independent of the executive compensation program to ensure that it continues to encourage and reward satisfaction of our operational and financial objectives. The Compensation Committee also consults with our CEO regarding compensation of our other executive officers.
Role of the Compensation Consultant
To assist in formulating the revised compensation arrangements of our executive officers, the Compensation Committee retained the services of Meridian in 2013. Meridian assessed the reasonableness and interrelation of the individual elements of the compensation packages and provided input to the Compensation Committee with respect to compensation practices among comparable public companies.
management. In determining the compensation consultant’s independence,making this determination, the Compensation Committee considered the factors outlined in the recently adopted New York Stock ExchangeNYSE listing standardsrelating to compensation consultant independence, including whether the compensation consultant has provided other services to the Company, the magnitude of the projected fees payable to the compensation consultant in the context of the Company’scompensation consultant's total revenues, the absence of personal or business relationships between members of the Compensation Committee or the Company’s executive officers and the compensation consultant, and whether any member of the compensation consultant’s team owns, or otherwise has an investment or interest in, the Company’s common stock. After careful consideration of the relevant factors, the Compensation Committee determined that engagement of Meridian did not pose or create any conflict of interest and further determined that Meridian was independent under the listing standards of the NYSE.

21




Meridian did not provide any services to the Company during 2013 other than the compensation consulting services that it provided to the Compensation Committee. Meridian did not provide any services to the Company during 2014 or 2015.
Compensation Components
The following are the primary components of the compensation packages for our executive officers, as prescribed by their employment agreements, are:compensation program:
Base salary;
Annual performance bonus (payable in cash); and
Annual long-term equity incentive compensation (payable in RSUs).
In addition to the foregoing, our executive officersNEOs are eligible to receive severance, certain perquisites and customary welfare and retirement benefits. Each of the primary components of our executive compensation program, and the methodology used to determine the amounts, and mix, of such compensation, are discussed herein.below.
Base Salaries
Minimum base salaries for executive officersour NEOs are established in their respective employment agreements, the material terms of which are summarized below under the heading “Employment Agreements.” Any increases to the base salaries of executive officers are approved byEach year, the Compensation Committee after considerationreviews the appropriateness of each individual’s accomplishments, areasNEO’s base salary. In determining whether to increase base salary of strengthan NEO, the Compensation Committee considers the following factors: competitive market data derived from our peer group, individual and opportunities for development.Company performance, and the NEO’s role and responsibilities. We believe that setting our executive officers’NEOs' base salaries within a market-competitive range of base salaries offered to similarly situated executives of comparable public companies will helpbased on the foregoing factors helps us to retain our executive officers,NEOs, while appropriately motivating them to fulfill their core responsibilities within VPG.and duties.
Variations in base salary of each ofamong our executive officersNEOs reflect the differences in their respective positions, duties and responsibilities. In particular, the Compensation Committee, in consultation with the Board, considered the average 2013 Company-wide U.S. employee salary increase effective September 1, 2013 (approximately 3.0%) in making increases to the respective salaries of the executive officers.
Effective January 1, 2015, and pursuant to amended employment agreements for Messrs. Shoshani, Clancy, and Kieffer and pursuant to Mr. Desilets' employment arrangement,2023, the annual base salaries for our executive officersNEOs were as follows:
  2015
Executive Base Salary
Ziv Shoshani    
       President and Chief Executive Officer $481,325 (1)
William M. Clancy    
       Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  300,000 
Roland B. Desilets    
       Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary  192,345 
Thomas P. Kieffer    
       Senior Vice President and Chief Technical Officer  242,515 
20232022
ExecutiveBase SalaryBase Salary% increase (3)
Ziv Shoshani
       President and Chief Executive Officer (1)$681,781 $720,053 4.0 %
William M. Clancy
       Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer$406,900 $391,250 4.0 %
Amir Tal
Executive Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer (2)$278,383 $294,010 4.0 %
____________________
(1)
(1)
Pursuant to Mr. Shoshani’s employment agreement, his 2023 base salary is 1,875,000was 2,516,896 New Israeli Shekels ("NIS") and his 2022 base salary was 2,420,092 NIS. The U.S. Dollar amount shown in the table is based on the weighted average exchange rate for 20152023 of 3.8955.

3.69165 and for 2022 of 3.36099.
(2)Pursuant to Mr. Tal's employment agreement, his 2023 base salary was 1,027,692 NIS and his 2022 base salary was 988,165. The U.S. Dollar amount shown in the table is based on the weighted average exchange rate for 2023 of 3.69165 and for 2022 of 3.36099.
(3)Percentage increase is based on local currency amounts.

Effective March 1, 2024, and in connection with his appointment as Executive Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer, Mr. Tal received an increase in his base salary to 1,130,461 NIS or $308,364, converted using a weighted
25




average budgeted exchange rate for 2024 of 3.666. Mr. Shoshani and Mr. Clancy did not receive an increase in base salary.
Annual Performance Cash Bonus
AnnualOur 2023 annual performance bonuses arecash bonus program was designed to incent our executive officersNEOs to achieve certain predetermined objectives set by the Compensation Committee and the Board. Similar to base salary, the Compensation Committee believes that it is appropriate and desirable to establish target
The 2023 annual performance bonuses within a market-competitive range of bonuses

22




granted to similarly situated executives at comparable public companies. We believe that setting target performance bonuses in this fashion is necessary to attract and retain executive officers, as well as to appropriately motivate them to make meaningful contributions to our business.
The performance bonuses for Mr. Shoshani and Mr. Clancy for 2015cash bonus payouts were based on achievement of two equally weighted corporate objectives: adjusted operating margin and adjusted EBITDA. The target levels of adjusted operating margin and adjusted EBITDA for 20152023 were set at $15.5$61.5 million and $27.7$78.1 million, respectively.
Adjusted operating margin and adjusted EBITDA mean, respectively, operating margin and 50%earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, in each case determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United Statesand adjusted to exclude various items that are outside of the bonus potential for Mr. Shoshaniour core operations, including purchase accounting inventory adjustments, restructuring and for Mr. Clancy was attributable to the achievement of each of these performance objectives.
related severance costs, and foreign exchange gains and losses. The performance bonus for Mr. Kieffer for 2015 was based onBoard determined that adjusted operating margin and adjusted EBITDA as well as certain objective individualfor 2023 should exclude the impact of $0.3 million for purchase accounting adjustments and financial performance goals approved by$1.6 million in restructuring costs. Additionally, adjusted EBITDA excludes the Compensation Committee relating to operations for which he is responsible. Pursuant to the termsimpact of his Amended Employment Agreement, he received a performance bonus equal to the target amount provided for under his prior employment agreement with us.$0.8 million of foreign currency exchange rates on assets and liabilities.
The performance bonus for Mr. Desilets for 2015 was based on the standard VPG Bonus Plan, pursuant to which bonuses are awarded based upon corporate financial results, as well as certain objective individual performance goals approved by the CEO and CFO.
TheThese performance targets for each of our executive officers arewere intended to represent challenging, but reasonable, goals, the achievement of which will contribute meaningfully to long-term stockholder value creation as well as the short-term success of our business.
Each of Messrs. Shoshani and Clancy was eligible to receive a performance bonus, for each 2015 performance objective, if the performance with respect to that objective equaled at least 80% of the targeted amount. If less than 80% of the threshold target for a performance goal iswere attained, the executiveNEOs would not receive any portion of thetheir performance bonus tied to such performance goal. The table below sets forth the payments that each of Messrs. Shoshani, Clancy, and ClancyTal would have been eligible to receive (expressed as a percentage of his base salary) pursuant to our annual performance bonus plan and his respective employment agreement with respect to each 20152023 performance objective, based upon various levels of actual performance.


Potential Performance Bonus Payments for Messrs. Shoshani, Clancy, and ClancyTal for Each Performance Objective, in Relation to Target Performance*
 
  Percentage of Target Performance Objective   
  Achieved Maximum
  Performance
  
80% of 
 
80—100% of 
 
100—150% of 
 Bonus for
  Target Target Target Each
 Performance Performance Performance Performance Performance
Percentage of Target Performance Objective
Achieved
Achieved
AchievedMaximum
PerformancePerformance
80% of
80% of
80—100% of
100—150% of
Bonus for
TargetTargetTargetTargetEach
PerformancePerformancePerformancePerformancePerformance
Executive Objective Objective Objective Objective ObjectiveExecutiveObjectiveObjectiveObjectiveObjective
Ziv Shoshani  
President and Adjusted EBITDA 25% 25-50% 50-100% 100% 
President and
President and
President and
President and
President and
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Executive Officer Adjusted Operating Margin 25% 25-50% 50-100% 100% 
  
William M. Clancy  
William M. Clancy
William M. Clancy
Executive Vice President
Executive Vice President
Executive Vice President
Executive Vice President
Executive Vice President
Executive Vice President Adjusted EBITDA 13.35% 13.35-25% 25-40% 40% 
and Chief Financial Officer Adjusted Operating Margin 13.35% 13.35-25% 25-40% 40% 
and Chief Financial Officer
and Chief Financial Officer
Amir Tal
Amir Tal
Amir Tal
Executive Vice President and
Executive Vice President and
Executive Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
Chief Accounting Officer
Chief Accounting Officer
26




*
*All performance bonus payments set forth in this table are expressed as a percentage of the applicable executive officer’s base salary and represent the potential payments to our executive officers with respect to each performance objective.


23




The aggregate target performance bonuses for each of Messrs. Shoshani, Clancy, and Kieffer,Tal, pursuant to their respective employment agreements and taking into account all 20152023 performance objectives, were 100%, 50%65%, and 30%50% of their respective base salaries. The aggregate target performance bonus for Mr. Desilets, pursuant to his employment arrangement, was 16%. The maximum 20152023 performance bonuses payable to Messrs. Shoshani, Clancy, Desilets, and KiefferTal were 200%, 80%, 20%105%, and 60%75% of their respective base salaries. We believe that the target and maximum performance bonus levels and the corresponding payouts are such that they do not encourage excessive risk-taking and represent appropriate compensation in light of each executive officer’s responsibilities.

The Board and the Compensation Committee determined that in 2015, our 2023 adjusted EBITDA was $22.3$60.4 million (or 80.4%77.4% of the target) and our 2023 adjusted operating margin was $13.1$43.8 million (or 84.7%71.3% of the target). Accordingly, because each performance goal was achieved at greater thanfor the 80% threshold level, Messrs. Shoshani and Clancy received a portion of each of their respective performance bonuses with respect to the Company's adjusted EBITDA target and the adjusted operating margin performance goals.

Upon review of Mr. Desilets' performance against certain quantitative individual performance goals and corporate financial goals applicable to him, in February 2016, the CFO and the CEO approved a performance bonus with respect to 2015 performance for Mr. Desilets.

The total of these performance bonuses for each executive is reflected under the “Non-Equity Incentive Compensation Plan” column of the Summary Compensation Table herein.

During 2015, in association with the restatement of our financial statements for the years 2012 through 2014,target, Messrs. Shoshani, Clancy and Kieffer voluntarily repaid $25,913, $6,674, and $1,179, respectively,Tal received no cash bonus as net over-paymentthe achievement was below 80% of their performance bonus payments for those periods.target.

Equity Compensation
Our executive compensation frameworkprogram uses the grant of long-term equity awards as the primary tool for aligning the interests of our executive officersNEOs with the long-term interests of our stockholders. The market-competitive rangeNEOs’ employment agreements established the following target value of long-term equity awards granted to similarly situated executive officers of comparable public companies was used as a reference point in establishing the target and maximum values of long-term equity awards. The long-term equity award targets for our executive officers were established to compensate each of them at the appropriate market-competitive median level according to their respective positions, duties and responsibilities, as well as to recognize their individual ability to affect stockholder value creation.
Pursuant to each executive officer's employment agreement, the value of each executive's annual equity grant is as follows:grants.

On or about January 1 of each year, each executiveNEO receives equity awards ("Annual Equity Grant"), with an equity award, made pursuant to the 2010 Stock Incentive Program with aaggregate value equal to 150%the following percentages of their base salary: 175% (with respect to Mr. Shoshani), 75% (with respect to Mr. Clancy), 38%and 40% (with respect to Mr. Kieffer) and 30% (with respect to Mr. Desilets) of such executive’s then-base salary (the “Annual Equity Grant”)Tal). The Annual Equity Grants,Grant, which are denominatedis in the form of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) of VPG, are, is sized based on the average closing price of VPG’sour stock on the New York Stock Exchange for the five consecutive trading days immediately preceding January 1 of the year of grant.
75%50% of the Annual Equity Grant is in the form of performance-based RSUs (“PBRSUs”("PBRSUs") which vest on January 1 of the third anniversary ofyear following the date of grant, but only to the extent that performance criteria have been achieved.achieved and provided the executive remains continuously employed by us through such date. The performance criteria are determined by the Compensation Committee and are based on metrics set forth in the 20102022 Stock Incentive Program.Plan.
25%50% of the Annual Equity Grant is in the form of time-vested RSUs which vest on January 1 of the third anniversary ofyear following the date of grant.grant provided the executive remains continuously employed by us through such date.
The Annual Equity grant is subject to accelerated vesting upon a change of control of the Company, an event giving rise to a severance entitlement, death or disability.


24




Pursuant to the Amended Employment Agreement with Mr. Kieffer, he is no longer eligible for an Annual Equity Grant beginning in 2016.


With respect to each performance criterion, and as illustrated below, (i) 50% of the total number of PBRSUs subject to such criterion will vest if 80% of the applicable objective is met;met, and (ii) an additional 2.5% of the total number of PBRSUs subject to such criterion will vest for each additional full 1% (between 80% and 100%) of the applicable performance objective that is met.


2015
27




2023 Annual Equity Grant Components

Performance-Based RSUs for Each Performance Objective
ExecutiveTime-Vested RSUs
(# of RSUs)
80% of
Target
(# of PBRSUs)
80—100% of Target
(# of PBRSUs)
Ziv Shoshani16,1584,039.754,039.75-8,079.5
William M. Clancy3,955988.75988.75-1,977.5
Amir Tal1,508377377-754
    Performance-Based RSUs for Each Performance Objective
Executive Time-Vested RSUs
(# of RSUs)
 80% of
Target
(# of PBRSUs)
 80—100% of Target
(# of PBRSUs)
Ziv Shoshani 10,300 7,726 
7,726 - 15,451

William Clancy 3,214 2,411 2,411 - 4,822
Thomas Kieffer 1,316 988 988 -1,975


Vesting of the PBRSUs included within the 2015 Annual Equity Grants is subject to the achievement over the three-year performance period ending on December 31, 2025 of two equally weighted corporate objectives: cumulative Adjusted Net Earnings over a three-year period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2017 and cumulative Adjusted Free Cash over the same three-year period.

Cash.
“Adjusted Net Earnings” means the Company’s net profits after taxes, including the impact of acquisitions, if any, adjusted for reconciling items as set forth in the associated years' annual reports to shareholders. “Freestockholders. “Adjusted Free Cash” means the amount of cash generated from the Company’s operations in excess of capital expenditures and net of proceeds from the sale of assets, including the impact of acquisitions, if any.

The target levels of Adjusted Net Earnings and Adjusted Free Cash over that three-year period from 2015-20172023-2025 were set at $35,655,000$139,200,000 and $22,168,000, respectively, and 50% of the vesting potential for each executive is attributable to the achievement of$91,862,000, respectively. The Company's achieved performance against each of these performance objectives.goals determines the vesting for fifty percent (50%) of the total number of PBRSUs granted to each NEO. These targets are intended to represent challenging, but reasonable, goals, the achievement of which will contribute meaningfully to long-term stockholder value creation as well as the long-term success of our business.
Each executive who received a 20152023 Annual Equity Grant is eligible to vest in a portion of the PBRSUs included within the 20152023 Annual Equity Grant to the extent that our performance with respect to one or both of the objectives equals at least 80% of the targeted amount. If the 80% threshold target for a performance goal is not attained, the executive would not receive any portion of the PBRSUs attributable to such target and that portion of the grant would be forfeited. The table above sets forth the vesting of the PBRSUs that each executive officer would be eligible to receive (expressed as a number of shares) pursuant to his respective employment agreement with respect to each 20152023 performance objective, based upon various levels of actual performance.
The Annual Equity Grants awarded to each of the executive officersNEOs in 20152023 are included in the “Stock Awards” column in the Summary Compensation Table herein. Because the 2015 Annual Equity Grants are subject to three-year cliff vesting, none of these awards has vested as of the date of this proxy statement.

In January 2013, and as previously described in our 2014 Proxy Statement, each of Messrs.March 2021, Mr. Shoshani, Mr. Clancy and Kieffer wasMr. Tal were granted PBRSUs that were subject to vesting based on two performance conditions - Adjusted Net Earnings and Adjusted Free Cash - measured over a three-year period ended December 31, 2015.2023. The Compensation Committee determined, after reviewing the Company’s performance during this measurement period, that the Company had achieved less than 80%131.6% of the target for bothFree Cash and 148.2% of the target for Adjusted Net Earnings and Free Cash.Earnings. Accordingly, none offor the PBRSUs granted to our named executive officersNEOs in January 2013March 2021, 100% of the PBRSUs for the Free Cash target vested and 100% of the PBRSUs for the Adjusted Net Earnings target vested.

25




Employment Agreements
The Company entered into employment agreements in 2011, which werehave been subsequently amended, in December 2011, with Messrs. Shoshani Clancy, and Kieffer that provideClancy. In March 2020, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Tal. Each of the employment agreements provides for the specific targets and payment opportunities, as expressed as a percentage of the applicable employee’s respective base salary, in connection with each element of our executive compensation package discussed hereinabove under the heading “Compensation Components.headings “Annual Performance Cash Bonus” and “Equity Compensation.
In November 2013, the Company entered into additional amendments to the employment agreements with Mr. Shoshani and Mr. Clancy which became effective on January 1, 2014 and which increased the base salary, target performance bonus, and the value of annual equity incentive awards for each of Messrs. Shoshani and Clancy beginning in 2014.
Each employment agreement became effective on July 6, 2010 and had an initial term of three years. The November 2013 amendments to our employment agreements with Messrs. Shoshani and Clancy provide for a one year term beginning on January 1, 2014. In January, 2016, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Desilets that provides for a one year term that began on January 1, 2016. Upon expiration of the current applicable term, all of our executives’Messrs. Shoshani's, Clancy's, and Tal's employment agreements automatically renew for one additional year unless earlier terminated by the Company or by the executive officer. Each of the employment agreements provides for certain severance payments to the executive officers in the event of
28




termination of their employment as described in greater detail under the heading “Potential Payments Upon a Termination or Change in Control.”
On December 23, 2015, the Company entered into the Amended Employment Agreement with Mr. Kieffer.
The employment agreements also contain customary non-solicitation and non-competition covenants, which remain in effect for 24 months following termination of employment with respect to Mr. Shoshani and for 12 months following termination of employment with respect to Messrs. Clancy Desilets, and Kieffer.Tal. The agreements also entitle the executives to additional perquisites and other personal benefits as the Board, through its Compensation Committee, determine are reasonable and consistent with the Company’s overall compensation program.
Deferred Compensation and Pension Plans
Vishay Intertechnology maintained, among other benefit plans, a non-qualified defined benefit plan (the “Vishay Non-Qualified Retirement Plan”); a qualified defined contribution plan (the “Vishay Employee Savings Plus Plan”); and a non-qualified deferred compensation plan (the “Vishay Key Employee Wealth Accumulation Plan” or “VSH KEWAP”), for highly compensated employees, including executive officers. In anticipation of the spin-off, we formed parallel plans that provide for substantially similar benefits. In connection with the spin-off from Vishay Intertechnology in 2010, Vishay Intertechnology caused the accounts and underlying assets and liabilities under the Vishay Intertechnology plans for our employees who were participating in those plans to be transferred to our corresponding plans or, in the case of Vishay Non-Qualified Retirement Plan and VSH KEWAP assets, from a rabbi trust established by Vishay Intertechnology to a rabbi trust that we established. In addition, prior to the spin-off, Vishay Intertechnology, through a subsidiary, maintained the Measurements Group Inc. Tax Deferred Savings Plan (a qualified defined contribution plan) that was transferred in its entirety to us in connection with the spin-off.
With the exception of Mr. Clancy, none of our executive officersNEOs participated in the Vishay Non-Qualified Retirement Plan. The Vishay Non-Qualified Retirement Plan was frozen effective December 31, 2008, and no further benefits have accrued beyond that date. In connection with the spin-off, we established a corresponding plan, the “VPG Non-Qualified Retirement Plan,” to preserve the benefits accumulated by certain of our employees under the Vishay Non-Qualified Retirement Plan. Only active employees who participated in the Vishay Non-Qualified Retirement Plan as of December 31, 2008 are eligible to participate in the parallel VPG plan. In connection with the freezing of the Vishay Non-Qualified Retirement Plan, Mr. Clancy became eligible to participate in a supplemental matching program under the Vishay Employee Savings Plus Plan, pursuant to which amounts were deposited in his VSH KEWAP account. This supplemental matching program continues under the corresponding VPG plans.
Every employee who has been designated as an Eligible Executive by the administrator of the Plan,plan, including our executive officers, is eligible to participate in our non-qualified deferred compensation plan (the “VPG KEWAP”). The VPG KEWAP permits eligible executives to make voluntary contributions and provides for discretionary Company contributions. In addition, we are required to make contributions on behalf of Mr. Clancy to his VPG KEWAP account as described above.


26




Perquisites
We provide executive officers with perquisites and other personal benefits that VPG and the Compensation Committee believebelieves are reasonable and consistent with our overall executive compensation program. These perquisites are not intended, however, to constitute a material portion of the executive’s compensation packages.package. In general, the perquisites, while not integral to the performance of an executive’s duties, must bear some relationship to the executive’s employment and be of perceived benefit to VPG. The Compensation Committee periodically reviews the levels of perquisites and other personal benefits provided to named executive officers.our NEOs.

Individual Considerations

Compensation among the Company’s senior executivesNEOs reflects a general assessment of their contributions to the Company’s current performance and its prospects for growth in the future. Our successes have always been fueled by the drivers of technological innovation, continuous efficiency improvement and synergistic acquisition. Mr. Shoshani leads in all these areas and his compensation reflects a perception by the Compensation Committee that the areas of his responsibility will continue to be the key drivers of our future performance.



29




Other Considerations Regarding Executive Compensation
Israeli benefits
Mr.Messrs. Shoshani isand Tal are employed by Vishay Advanced Technologies, Ltd., an Israeli subsidiary of VPG, and is a residentare residents of Israel. As a result, he isthey are entitled to certain benefits that are generally available to employees in Israel on a non-discriminatory basis, but are not afforded to the other named executive officers,Mr. Clancy, including:

advanced training fund, 7.5% of base salary

severance fund, 8.33% of base salary

disability insurance, up to 2.5%1.0% of base salary

pension fund, 5%5.5% of base salary

These benefits are required by Israeli law or employment practices generally, and were taken into account by the Compensation Committee in formulating the overall compensation packagepackages for Mr. Shoshani.
Messrs. Shoshani and Tal.
Foreign currency considerations
The Compensation Committee evaluates the effect of foreign currency conversion rates in formulating the overall compensation packagepackages for Mr. Shoshani and Mr. Tal. We determined to set Mr. Shoshani’s base salary in New Israeli Shekels beginning January 1, 2014.2015. Effective January 1, 2023, Mr. Shoshani’s base salary for 2015 was NIS 1,875,000.

Tax deductibility of executive compensation
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits to $1 million the2,516,896 on an annual tax deduction for compensation paid to each of the CEO and any of the three highest paid other executive officers, other than the CEO and the Chief Financial Officer. However, compensation that qualifies as performance-based compensation is deductible evenbasis. Mr. Tal's base salary in excess of $1 million. As part of its role, the Compensation Committee reviews and considers the deductibility of executive compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code. Our CEO’s compensation is paid by ourNew Israeli subsidiary, Vishay Advanced Technologies, Ltd. ("VAT"). However, a portion of that compensation is reimbursed to VAT by VPG. The portion of our CEO’s compensation that is paid by, and allocated to, VAT is subject to Israeli tax laws, pursuant to which there is no limit on deductibility. The portion that is reimbursed to VAT by VPG is not treated as compensation for Section 162(m) purposes.


27




In certain situations, the Compensation Committee may approve compensation that will not satisfy the requirements of Section 162(m), in order to ensure competitive levels of total compensation for its executive officers.

Shekels effective January 1, 2023 was NIS 1,027,692.
Executive Compensation Advisory Vote and Its Frequency

In line with the recommendation by the Company’s stockholders at the Company’s 2011 annual meeting that an advisory stockholder vote on executive compensation be conducted at least triennially, the Company’s Board of DirectorsWe included an advisory stockholder vote on executive compensation (commonly referred to as "say-on-pay") in its 2014our 2023 proxy materials. The Compensation Committee appreciates that over 98%99% of the shares votingvotes cast on such proposal approved the executive compensation discussed and disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and the narrative executive compensation disclosure contained in our 20142023 Proxy Statement. Our Compensation Committee interprets the results of this vote as an endorsement of existing programs and therefore, we have not made material changes to our approach to executive officer compensation based on such vote.

In addition, we included in our 2023 proxy materials an advisory stockholder vote on how frequently the Company should conduct a “say-on-pay” vote. In line with the Board of Directors’ recommendation, a majority of the shares voting recommended that the Company conduct a “say-on-pay” vote annually. Therefore, our Board of Directors is again this year submitting for a non-binding stockholder vote our executive compensation as described in this proxy statement.

Prohibition on Hedging and Pledging our Common Stock
The Company considers it inappropriate for persons employed by or associated with the Company to engage in certain transactions related to the securities of the Company and its affiliates (“Subject Securities”) that could result in their interests no longer being aligned with the same interests and objectives as other stockholders of the Company. Therefore, as part of its Securities Trading Policy, the Company restricts these persons from hedging, engaging in short-sales, transacting in publicly traded options, and pledging Subject Securities.

The restrictions apply to all directors, officers, employees, and consultants of the Company or its subsidiaries (“service providers”) as well as family members and any others that reside with a service provider. Family members who do not reside with a service provider are subject to the restrictions if a service provider directs, influences or controls their transactions in Subject Securities. This includes, for example, parents or children of a service provider who consult with the service provider regarding their trades (collectively, the “covered persons”).
Hedging
Certain hedging and monetization transactions, such as zero-cost collars and forward sale contracts, involve the establishment of a short position in the Subject Securities and limit or eliminate the covered person’s ability to profit from an increase in the value of the Subject Securities. Accordingly, these transactions can cause a covered person’s interests to be misaligned with other stockholders of the Company. The Company therefore prohibits all hedging and
28
30







monetization transactions involving the Subject Securities. Short sales of Subject Securities (sales of securities that are not then owned), including a “sale against the box” (a sale with delayed delivery), and transactions in publicly traded options in the Subject Securities, such as puts, calls and other derivative securities, are also prohibited.
Pledging
Subject Securities held in a margin account or pledged as collateral for a loan may be sold without the covered person’s consent if he or she fails to meet a margin call or defaults on a loan, which may occur at a time when the covered person is aware of material nonpublic information or is otherwise not permitted to trade in Company securities. Therefore, these activities are prohibited.

Clawback Policy

In November 2023, the Compensation Committee adopted a Dodd-Frank Clawback Policy (the “Clawback Policy”) to adhere to the listing standards of NYSE and the rules of the SEC implementing Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. The Clawback Policy requires the Compensation Committee to recoup certain cash and equity incentive compensation paid to executive officers in the event the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the federal securities laws (subject to certain limited exceptions). Under the Clawback Policy, the Compensation Committee will require recoupment if it determines that incentive-based compensation received by an executive during a three-year lookback period exceeded the amount of incentive-based compensation that otherwise would have been received, had it been calculated based on the restated amounts. The Clawback Policy is administered by the Compensation Committee, which has the sole discretion in making all determinations under the Clawback Policy, including the method for recovering erroneously awarded compensation.

Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines

To further align the interests of the Company's executives with its stockholders, the Board adopted stock ownership guidelines in 2021 (the “Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines”) applicable to the Company’s executive officers and other individuals who, from time to time, are deemed subject to the Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines by the Compensation Committee (the “Covered Executives”). The Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines are as follows:
The Company’s Chief Executive Officer is required to own shares of the Company’s common stock having an aggregate fair market value equal to or greater than three (3) times the Chief Executive Officer’s base salary as of the Measurement Date (market close on the first trading day in March of each calendar year);
Each Covered Executive, other than the Chief Executive Officer, is required to own shares of the Company’s common stock having an aggregate fair market value equal to or greater than one (1) times such Covered Executive’s base salary as of the Measurement Date (market close on the first trading day in March of each calendar year); and
Individuals that are Covered Executives as of the date the Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines were adopted will have until the first trading day in March of 2026 to attain the specified level of equity ownership. Any individual who becomes a Covered Executive later will have until the first Measurement Date that occurs at least five years from the date he or she became a Covered Executive to attain the specified level of equity ownership.
Following the 5-year phase-in period, Covered Executives who do not meet the required ownership threshold will be generally prohibited from selling stock acquired through equity awards.
The following will be considered “owned” for the purposes of the Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines:
all shares underlying time-based equity awards, whether or not vested;
only vested shares underlying performance-based equity awards; and
shares held outright or beneficially owned by the Covered Executive, his or her spouse and minor children, or any trust for the benefit of these individuals.
31




REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
 
To Our Stockholders:
 
We have reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Based on that review and discussion, we have recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.
 
Respectfully submitted,
 
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
 
Dr. Samuel Broydo, ChairmanJanet Clarke, Chair
Saul Reibstein
Timothy Talbert
 
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of our previous or future filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act that might incorporate this proxy statement or futurein such filings with the SEC, in whole or in part, the above report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or “filed” with the SEC and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any such filing.



29
32







COMPENSATION TABLES
Summary Compensation Table
The information included in the table should be read in conjunction with the footnotes which follow, the descriptions of the employment agreements with each named executive officerNEO described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” and the “Grants of Plan Based Awards,” “Outstanding Equity Awards,” “Option Exercises and Stock Vested,” “Pension Benefits,” and “Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation” tables on the pages which follow.
Change in
Pension
Value and
Non-EquityNonqualified
Incentive PlanDeferred Comp.All Other
SalaryBonusStock AwardsOption AwardsCompensationEarningsComp.Total
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)
Name and Principal PositionYear($)($)($)($)($)($)($)($)
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)(i)(j)
Ziv Shoshani2023$681,781$$1,409,021$$$19,212 $243,906$2,353,920
President and Chief2022$720,053$$1,113,891$$645,443$— $241,666$2,721,053
Executive Officer2021$705,270$$1,324,906$$1,314,127$1,700 $278,815$3,624,818
William M. Clancy2023$406,900$$344,876$$$33,485 $59,483$844,744
Executive Vice President and2022$391,250$$240,506$$236,800$— $64,462$933,018
Chief Financial Officer2021$376,202$$301,035$$374,441$— $61,821$1,113,499
Amir Tal2023$278,383$$131,498$$0$$115,643$525,524
Executive Vice President and2022$294,010$$103,970$$133,041$$118,989$650,010
Chief Accounting Officer2020265,437113,970 190,006107,123676,536
                   Change in      
                   Pension      
                   Value and      
                Non-Equity Nonqualified      
                Incentive Plan Deferred Comp. All Other   
    Salary Bonus Stock Awards Option Awards Compensation Earnings Comp.   
    (1)   (2)   (3) (4) (5) (6) Total
Name and Principal Position Year ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($)
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j)
Ziv Shoshani 2015 $481,325 $- $685,601 $- $271,756 $1,411 $187,774 $1,627,867
President and 2014 $523,758 $- $859,474 $- $308,763 $34,516 $208,389 $1,934,900
Chief Executive Officer 2013 $483,285 $100,000 $623,407 $- $- $(11,758) $191,312 $1,386,246
                           
William M. Clancy 2015 $300,000 $- $213,940 $- $89,131 $(15,011) $68,440 $656,500
Executive Vice President and 2014 $300,000 $- $239,138 $- $92,615 $93,213 $67,869 $792,835
Chief Financial Officer 2013 $272,479 $40,000 $140,712 $- $- $(51,184) $56,300 $458,307
                           
Roland B. Desilets 2015 $192,345 $- $- $- $34,326 $- $34,917 $261,588
Vice President,                         
General Counsel and                         
Secretary                          
                           
Thomas P. Kieffer 2015 $242,515 $- $87,626 $- $72,755 $- $42,346 $445,242
Senior Vice President and 2014 $242,515 $- $97,950 $- $43,095 $- $41,571 $425,131
Chief Technology Officer 2013 $238,940 $- $93,713 $- $10,729 $- $40,531 $383,913


____________________


3033







(1)
(1)
Column (c) reflects each executive officer’sNEO’s base salary. Effective January 1, 2023, Mr. Shoshani’s employment agreement provides for his salary to be 1,875,000was 2,516,896 New Israeli Shekels and Mr. Tal's salary was 1,027,692 New Israeli Shekels. In 2015,2023, the average U.S. Dollar/New Israeli ShekelShekel/U.S. Dollar exchange rate was 3.8955.3.69165 NIS per U.S. Dollar.
(2)Column (e) represents the grant-date fair value of RSUs granted to each executive officerNEO in connection with the long-term equity award component of his compensation and in accordance with his employment agreement, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and the assumptions as set forth in Note 10 of our consolidated financial statements onin the Form 10-K filed on March 9, 2016, and assuming that all performance criteria are completely satisfied. For financial statement reporting purposes, the amount of compensation expense for RSUs is recognized ratably over the vesting period of the respective awards. The grant-date fair value does not necessarily reflect the value of shares actually received or which may be received in the future with respect to these awards.
(3)Column (g) represents performance-based cash bonuses that our executive officersNEOs received with respect to performance in the applicable year. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Components, Performance Bonus.” The amounts shown for 2014 have been reduced due to the voluntary repayment by Messrs. Shoshani, Clancy, and Kieffer of $32,732, $8,736, and $1,516, respectively, as over-payment of their performance bonus payments in association with the restatement of financial statements for that year.
(4)
Column (h) reflects the change in the actuarial present value of the named executive officer’sNEOs pension and other post-employment benefits under respective defined benefit retirement plans, from the plan measurement date used in preparing the prior year consolidated financial statements to the plan measurement date used in preparing the current year consolidated financial statements, determined using the same interest rate, mortality, and other actuarial assumptions used in our consolidated financial statements. See the “Pension Benefits” table herein for more information on the benefits payable to the named executive officersNEOs under their respective pension plans.
(5)
Each executive officer wasNEO is entitled to participate as of January 1, 2015, in the VPG non-qualified deferred compensation plan, which is substantially similar to its predecessor plan sponsored by Vishay Intertechnology.Intertechnology at the time of the spin-off. Under the VPG non-qualified deferred compensation plan, deferred amounts are credited with earnings based on the performance of notional investment options available under the plan. No portion of the earnings credited during 20152023 was “above market” or “preferential.” Consequently, no deferred compensation plan earnings are included in the amounts reported in Column (h). See the “Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation” table for more information on the benefits payable under the VPG non-qualified deferred compensation plan.
(6)(5)All other compensation includes, as applicable, amounts deposited on behalf of each named executive officer into VPG’s non-qualified deferred compensation plan, pursuant to the employment agreements with each named executive officer, personal use of company car, company match on 401(k) contributions, benefits generally available to employees in Israel, and other perquisites, as described herein:herein in the table below.
  2015 2014 2013  
 Ziv Shoshani
 $20,019 $18,788 $17,734 Personal use of Company car*
   146,386  165,007  150,680 Israeli employment benefits*
   21,369  24,594  22,898 Medical and prescription drug insurance premiums
  $187,774 $208,389 $191,312  
            
William M. Clancy $21,200 $20,800 $9,992 Company contributions to nonqualified deferred compensation plan
   13,207  13,292  13,800 Personal use of Company car
   10,600  10,400  10,200 Company match to 401(k) plan
   22,191  22,135  21,066 Medical and prescription drug insurance premiums
   1,242  1,242  1,242 Group Term Life imputed income
  $68,440 $67,869 $56,300  
            
Roland B. Desilets ** $ $  $  Company contributions to nonqualified deferred compensation plan
   12,209       Personal use of Company car
   8,397       Company match to 401(k) plan
   13,394       Medical and prescription drug insurance premiums
   917       Group Term Life imputed income
  $34,917 $0 $0  
            
Thomas P. Kieffer $ $ $480 Company contributions to nonqualified deferred compensation plan
   9,276  8,636  6,112 Personal use of Company car
   10,600  9,734  11,774 Company contribution to 401(k) plan ***
   19,024  19,755  18,788 Medical and prescription drug insurance premiums
   3,446  3,446  3,377 Group Term Life imputed income
  $42,346 $41,571 $40,531  
2023
Ziv Shoshani$33,091 Personal use of Company car*
210,815Israeli employment benefits*
0Medical and prescription drug insurance premiums
$243,906 
William M. Clancy$13,200 Company contribution to nonqualified deferred compensation plan
14,189Personal use of Company car
13,200Company match to 401(k) plan
15,330Medical and prescription drug insurance premiums
3,564Group Term Life imputed income
$59,483 
Amir Tal$19,113 Personal use of Company car*
96,530 Israeli employment benefits*
$115,643 
____________________
* Represents amounts paid in New Israeli Shekels (NIS) and translated at average exchange rates for the year. In 2015, 2023, the average U.S. Dollar/New Israeli ShekelShekel/U.S. Dollar exchange rate was 3.8955.3.69165 NIS per U.S. Dollar.
** Mr. Desilets was appointed an executive officer in November 2015.
*** In accordance with the terms of the relevant 401 (k) plan for Mr. Kieffer, the Company contribution to that 401(k) plan ended March 31, 2013 and amounts paid by Company into the 401 (k) plan thereafter were a Company match.

31
34







Grants of Plan Based Awards
The following table provides information with regard to plan based awards granted to each named executive officerNEO during 2015.2023. The information included in the table should be read in conjunction with the footnotes which follow and the description of performance bonuses and long-term equity incentive awards described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Components.”
The following table provides information concerning grants of plan-based awards to our named executive officersNEOs during the year ended December 31, 2015.2023.
     Grant Date
     All Other Fair Value of
 
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-
Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1)
 
Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards (2)
 Stock Awards (3) Stock Awards (4)
Grant DateGrant Date
All OtherAll OtherFair Value of
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-
Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1)
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-
Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1)
Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards (2)
Stock Awards (3)Stock Awards (4)
Name Grant Date Threshold
($)
 Target
($)
 Maximum ($) Threshold
(#)
 Target (#) Maximum
(#)
 (#) ($)NameGrant DateThreshold
($)
Target
($)
Maximum ($)Threshold
(#)
Target (#)Maximum
(#)
(#)($)
Ziv Shoshani   240,662  481,325  962,649          
2/28/23
2/28/23
2/28/238,08016,159704,532
2/28/232/28/2316,158704,489
William M. Clancy
2/28/23
2/28/23
2/28/231,9783,955172,438
2/28/232/28/233,955172,438
 1/20/15 15,451 30,902  514,209
 1/20/15 10,300 171,392
William M. Clancy 80,100 150,000 240,000 
 1/20/15 4,822 9,643  160,460
 1/20/15 3,214 53,481
 
Roland B. Desilets 6,002 33,695 42,118 
 
Thomas P. Kieffer 48,503 72,755 145,509 
 1/20/15 1,975 3,950  65,728
 1/20/15 1,316 21,898
Amir Tal
Amir Tal
Amir Tal
2/28/23
2/28/23
2/28/237541,50865,749
2/28/232/28/231,50865,749
____________________

 
(1)
(1)For 2015,2023, Mr. Shoshani, Mr. Clancy, and Mr. ClancyTal were each eligible to earn an annual performance bonus based on the achievement of certaineach of adjusted EBITDA and adjusted operating margin targets. Mr. Kieffer was eligible to earn 50% of his potential annual performance bonus based on the achievement of the same targets, with the remaining 50% of his potential annual performance bonus based on certain individual and financial performance goals. Mr. Desilets participated in the standard VPG Bonus Plan and was eligible to receive a bonus based upon certain quantitative individual performance goals and corporate financial goals applicable to him. The threshold value for each executive officerNEO was determined assuming that each performance criterionmetric applicable to such executive officerbonus for each NEO was satisfied at the minimum level triggering payment. An executive is not entitled to receive any payoutbonus payment with respect to a particular performance criterionmetric if less than 80% of the targeted performance target is achieved. Each executive officer’sNEOs performance bonus package is further described under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Components, Performance Bonus.” Performance bonuses for our NEOs relating to our executive officers’ 20152023 performance were paid, to the extent earned, in March 2016.not earned.
(2)For 2015,2023, each of Messrs. Shoshani, Clancy, and KiefferTal was granted an annual long-term equity incentive award, 75%50% of which was in the form of performance-based RSUs which will vest on January 1, 2018, as and2026, to the extent that each performance criteria have beenmetric is achieved. The threshold figure for each executive officerNEO was determined assuming that each performance criterionmetric applicable to such executive officerperformance-based RSUs for each NEO was satisfied at the minimum level triggering vesting. An executive is not entitled to receive any payoutvesting with respect to a particular performance criterionmetric if less than 80% of the targeted performance metric is achieved. Each executive officer’sNEOs long-term equity award package is further described under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Components, Equity Compensation.” Long-term equity incentive awards for our executive officersNEOs for 20152023 were granted on January 20, 2015.February 28, 2023.
(3)For 2015,2023, each of Messrs. Shoshani, Clancy, and KiefferTal was granted an annual long-term equity incentive award, 25%50% of which was in the form of time-vested RSUs, which will vest on January 1, 2018.2026. Each executive officer’sNEOs long-term equity award package is further described under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Components, Equity Compensation.”
(4)Long-term equity incentive awards, including both time-vested and performance-based RSUs for our executive officersNEOs for 20152023 were granted on January 20, 2015,February 28, 2023, and their aggregate grant date fair value was computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and based on a stock price of $16.64$43.60 (the closing price of our Common Stock on January 16, 2015 (the last trading day prior to the date of grant))February 28, 2023).









32
35








Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
The following table provides information regarding (i) unexercised options and (ii) unvested stock awards and equity incentive plan awards held by our named executive officersNEOs and outstanding as of December 31, 2015.2023.
Stock Awards
Time-Vested RSUsPBRSUs
NameGrant DateNumber of shares or units of stock that have not vested (#)Market value of shares or units of stock that have not vested ($) (4)Number of unearned shares or units of stock that have not vested (#)Market value of unearned shares or units of stock that have not vested ($)(4)
Ziv Shoshani3/4/2021(1)19,983$680,821 19,984$680,855 
3/3/2022(2)18,266$622,323 18,267$622,357 
2/28/2023(3)16,158$550,503 13,700$466,759 
William M. Clancy3/4/2021(1)4,541$154,712 4,540$154,678 
3/3/2022(2)3,944$134,372 3,944$134,372 
2/28/2023(3)3,955$134,747 2,958$100,779 
Amir Tal3/4/2021(1)1,719$58,566 1,719$58,566 
3/3/2022(2)1,705$58,089 1,705$58,089 
2/28/2023(3)1,508$51,378 1,279$43,576 
    Option Awards Stock Awards
    Number of Number of     Number of   
    Securities Securities     Shares or Market Value of
    Underlying Underlying Option   Units of Shares or Units
    Unexercised Unexercised Exercise Option Stock That of Stock That
    Options (#) Options (#) Price Expiration Have Not Have Not Vested
Name Grant Date (Exercisable) (Unexercisable) ($) Date Vested (#) ($) (5)
Ziv Shoshani 3/15/2011 18,826(1)- 
$18.92
 2/27/2017     
  1/16/2013         45,974(2) 520,426
  1/29/2014         57,070(3) 646,032
  1/20/2015         41,202(4) 466,407
                
William M. Clancy 1/16/2013         10,377(2) 117,468
  1/29/2014         15,879(3) 179,750
  1/20/2015         12,857(4) 145,541
                
Roland B. Desilets           -  -
                
Thomas P. Kieffer 1/16/2013         6,911(2) 78,233
  1/29/2014         6,504(3) 73,625
  1/20/2015         5,266(4) 59,611
____________________

(1)
(1)Represents options granted in replacement of corresponding options to purchase common stock of Vishay Intertechnology that were cancelled in connection with the Company’s spin off from Vishay Intertechnology. 12,550 options vested on the date of grant, and the remaining 6,276 options vested in two equal annual installments on each of February 27, 2012 and February 27, 2013.
(2)Represents annual equity incentive awards, 75%50% of which are in the form of time-vested RSUs which vest on January 1, 2024, subject to continued service through such date, and 50% of which are in the form of PBRSUs which vest on January 1, 2016,2024, but only to the extent that the given performance criteria have beenmetric is achieved and 25%subject to continued service through such date. The number of PBRSUs presented assumes that one performance metric has been satisfied at the "maximum" level, which is 100% of target, and one performance metric has been satisfied at “threshold” level, which is 80% of target.
(2)Represents annual equity incentive awards, 50% of which are in the form of time-vested RSUs which vest on January 1, 2016.
(3)Represents annual equity incentive awards, 75%2025, subject to continued service through such date, and 50% of which are in the form of PBRSUs which vest on January 1, 2017,2025, but only to the extent that the given performance criteria have beenmetric is achieved and 25%subject to continued service through such date. The number of PBRSUs presented assumes that the performance metric has been satisfied at the “maximum” level, which is 100% of target.
(3)Represents annual equity incentive awards, 50% of which are in the form of time-vested RSUs which vest on January 1, 2017.
(4)Represents annual equity incentive awards, 75%2026, subject to continued service through such date, and 50% of which are in the form of PBRSUs which vest on January 1, 2018,2026, but only to the extent that the given performance criteria have beenmetric is achieved and 25%subject to continued service through such date. The number of PBRSUs presented assumes that the performance metric has been satisfied at the “maximum” level, which are in the formis 100% of RSUs which vest on January 1, 2018.target.
(5)(4)The market value is based on the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2015,2023, which was $11.32.$34.07.



33
36







Option Exercises and Stock Vested
The following table provides information with regard to amounts paid to or received by our named executive officersNEOs during 20152023 as a result of the vesting of RSUs that were granted to the executive officersNEOs as part of their compensation agreements.
 Stock Awards
 Number of 
 Shares Value
 Acquired on Realized on
Stock AwardsStock Awards
Number of
Shares
Shares
SharesValue
Acquired onAcquired onRealized on
Name Vesting (#) VestingNameVesting (#)Vesting
(a) (d) (e)(a)(d)(e)
Ziv Shoshani 4,511(1) $77,409Ziv Shoshani8,323(1)$321,684
21,30821,308(2)$929,029
 6,768(2) $116,139
William M. Clancy
William M. Clancy
William M. Clancy2,033(1)$78,575
5,2075,207(2)$227,025
 3,582(3) $54,984
Amir Tal
Amir Tal
Amir Tal711(1)$27,480
1,8201,820(2)$79,352
 
William Clancy 1,329(1) $22,806
 1,525(2) $26,169
 885(3) $13,585
 
Roland B. Desilets - -
 
Thomas Kieffer 856(1) $14,689
 1,285(2) $22,051
 321(3) $4,927
____________________
(1)
(1)Represents a portion of annual equity incentive awards comprised of time-vested RSUs granted to each of our executive officers with respect to 2012 service.NEOs in 2020. These RSUs vested on January 1, 2015.2023.
(2)Represents a portion of annual equity incentive awards comprised of performance-based RSUs granted to each of our executive officers with respect to 2012 performance.NEOs in 2020. These RSUsPBRSUs vested on March 6, 2015.
(3)Represents a portion of annual equity incentive awards comprised of RSUs granted to each of our executive officers with respect to 2011 performance. These RSUs vested on March 20, 2015.February 28, 2023.
Pension Benefits
Prior to the spin-off, our pension benefits were administered by Vishay Intertechnology. Beginning in January 2010, we began adopting independent pension benefit plans with substantially similar terms as those maintained by Vishay Intertechnology at the time of the spin-off to ensure continuity of benefits for those Vishay Intertechnology employees who became VPG employees at the spin-off. A description of legacy Vishay Intertechnology plans and the new plans that we adopted in their place follows.
In the United States, Vishay Intertechnology maintained a non-qualified pension plan which provided defined benefits to U.S. employees whose participation in the qualified pension plan could jeopardize the qualification of such plan under the Internal Revenue Code. The plan was contributory and, other than its non-qualified status under ERISA, provided substantially the same benefits that were available under Vishay Intertechnology’s qualified retirement plan. Employees with five or more years of service were entitled to annual pension benefits beginning at normal retirement age on the first day of the month following the participant’s 65th birthday equal to the sum of 2.1% of the first $10,000 of earnings plus 2.64% of the annual earnings in excess of $10,000 with a new pension unit earned each year. The final pension was the sum of all units earned during the employee’s career. The plan permitted early retirement if the participant was at least age 55 and had at least five years of service. Employees could elect to receive their pension benefits in the form of a joint and survivor annuity or other contingent annuities. Employees were 100% vested immediately in their contributions. If employees terminated before rendering five years of service, they forfeited the right to receive the portion of their accumulated plan benefits attributable to the Company's contributions. Employees received the value of their accumulated benefits as a life annuity payable monthly from retirement. For each employee electing a life

34




annuity, payments would not be less than the greater of (a) the employee’s accumulated contributions plus interest or (b) an annuity for five years. In connection with the spin-off, VPG adopted the VPG Non-Qualified Retirement Plan, which provides for substantially similar benefits to those provided by its Vishay Intertechnology counterpart.counterpart at the time of the spin-off. Like the Vishay Non-Qualified Retirement Plan at the time of the spin-off, the VPG Non-Qualified Retirement Plan is frozen with respect to participation and accrual of benefits.
37




The following table provides information regarding the present value of benefits accrued under these retirement benefit plans and arrangements for our named executive officers:NEOs:
 Number Present Value 
 of Years of 
 Credited Accumulated Payments During
Number
of Years
of Years
of Years
Credited
Credited
CreditedAccumulatedPayments During
Name Plan Name Service Benefit (1) Last Fiscal YearNamePlan NameServiceBenefit (1)Last Fiscal Year
(a) 
 (b)
 (#)(c) ($)(d) ($)(e)(a)
 (b)
(#)(c)($)(d)($)(e)
Ziv Shoshani Individual contractual postemployment medical arrangement (2) n/a $113,873 $-
 
William M. Clancy VPG Non-qualified Retirement Plan (3) 15 $371,378 $-
William M. Clancy
William M. Clancy
____________________

(1)
(1)These amounts have been calculated using interest rate, mortality, and other actuarial assumptions consistent with those used for financial reporting purposes set forth in Note 9 to VPG’s consolidated financial statements included in our 2015 Annual Report onthe Form 10-K.
(2)Pursuant to Mr. Shoshani’s employment agreement, if his employment ceases on or after his attainment of age 62 (other than for cause), the Company agreed to pay healthcare premiums to cover, for their respective lifetimes, Mr. Shoshani and his spouse and his children under theuntil age of 26 up to an aggregate amount of $15,000 annually. The amount set forth in the table above represents the present value of this benefit.
(3)Mr. Clancy elected to begin participating in the Vishay Non-Qualified Retirement Plan effective January 1, 2000 and subsequently transferred to the VPG Non-Qualified Retirement Plan effective January 1, 2010. The Vishay Non-Qualified Retirement Plan was frozen effective December 31, 2008, such that participants accruedaccrue no additional benefits. The VPG Non-Qualified Retirement Plan is similarly frozen. Mr. Clancy is eligible for early retirement under the VPG Non-Qualified Retirement Plan.
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation
The named executive officersTwo of the NEOs participate in the VPG KEWAP (a non-qualified deferred compensation plan), which is available to all employees who meet certain criteria under the Internal Revenue Code. In addition to being eligible to participate in the VPG KEWAP, Mr. Clancy and Mr. Kieffer areis entitled to receive Company contributions to theirhis VPG KEWAPaccountsaccount associated with theirhis participation in the VPG 401(k) plan. The named executive officersNEOs are also eligible to elect to defer additional amounts of compensation, subject to certain limitations. Only Mr. Kieffer elected to defer additional amounts of compensation during 2015.
While deferred, amounts are credited with “earnings” based on the performance of notional investment options available under the plan. No portion of the earnings credited during 20152023 was “above market” or “preferential.”









35




The following table sets forth information relating to the activity in the non-qualified deferred compensation plan accounts of the named executive officersNEOs during 20152023 and the aggregate balance of the accounts as of December 31, 2015:2023:
 Executive Registrant Aggregate Aggregate
 Contributions Contributions Earnings in Aggregate Balance at
 in Last Fiscal in Last Fiscal Last Fiscal Withdrawals/ Last Fiscal
ExecutiveExecutiveRegistrantAggregateAggregate
ContributionsContributionsContributionsEarnings inAggregateBalance at
in Last Fiscalin Last Fiscalin Last FiscalLast FiscalWithdrawals/Last Fiscal
Name Year Year (1) Year Distributions Year EndNameYearYear (1)YearDistributionsYear End
(a) ($)(b) ($)(c) ($)(d) ($)(e) ($)(f)(a)($)(b)($)(c)($)(d)($)(e)($)(f)
Ziv Shoshani $- $- $5,524 $- $883,866Ziv Shoshani$— $$— $$263,753$— $$1,687,669
William M. Clancy - 21,200 (2) 1,015 (36,859) 221,842William M. Clancy— 13,20013,200 (2)74,767— 506,331506,331
Roland B. Desilets - - - - -
Thomas P. Kieffer 43,964 - 42,023 - 1,453,012
____________________

(1)
(1)These amounts are included in Column (i) of the “Summary Compensation Table” as a component of “All Other Compensation.” No portion of the earnings credited during 20152023 was “above market” or “preferential.” Accordingly, no amounts related to earnings on deferred compensation have been included in the “Summary Compensation Table.”
(2)This amount was contributed by the Company; the Company has an on-going matching contribution obligation with respect to Mr. Clancy pursuant to the supplemental match arrangement described herein under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Deferred Compensation and Pension Plans.”



38







Potential Payments Upon Termination or a Change in Control
Our employment agreements with our named executive officersNEOs provide incrementalcertain compensation in the event of termination, as described herein.herein, as well as customary non-solicitation and non-competition covenants as described above in "Employment Agreements". Generally, VPG does not provide any severance specifically upon a change in control. However, our RSU agreements with the named executive officersNEOs do provide for accelerated vesting upon a change in control. Termination of employment also impacts any outstanding stock options, RSUs, and non-qualified deferred compensation balances.
If we terminate Mr. Shoshani without “cause,” or if Mr. Shoshani resigns with “good reason” (as such terms are defined in his employment agreement) he is entitled to a severance package consisting of:
24 months of base salary continuation;
any earned but unpaid performance bonus for the immediately preceding calendar year;
the immediate vesting of all of the executive’s outstanding time-vested RSUs;
the executive’s outstanding PBRSUs grantedshall vest on their normal vesting date to the extent applicable performance criteria are realized (provided that upon a change in control, all outstanding PBRSUs would immediately vest as if the performance criteria had been satisfied at the target level);
a pro rata annual performance bonus (calculated based on his performance bonus target); and
continuation of certain health and medical benefits for three years following termination, provided that if the Executive’s employment terminates for any reason other than by the Company for "cause," after the executive attains age 62, such coverage will continue for the life of the executive.
If we terminate Messrs. Clancy or after January 1, 2012Tal without “cause,” or if they resign with “good reason” (as such terms are defined in their respective employment agreements) Mr. Clancy and Mr. Tal are entitled to a severance package consisting of:
18 months of base salary continuation;
the immediate vesting of all of their outstanding time-vested RSUs;
the executive’s outstanding PBRSUs shall vest on their normal vesting date to the extent applicable performance criteria are realized (provided that upon a change in control, all outstanding PBRSUs would immediately vest as if the performance criteria had been satisfied); at the target level;
a pro rata annual performance bonus (calculated based on his performance bonus target); and
continuation of certain health and medical benefits for three years following termination, provided that if the Executive’s employment terminates for any reason other than by the Company for Cause, after the executive attains age 62, such coverage will continue for the life of the executive.
If we terminate Messrs. Clancy, Kieffer, or Desilets without “cause,” or if they resign with “good reason” (as such terms are defined in their respective employment agreements) they are entitled to a severance package consisting of:
12 months of base salary continuation;
the immediate vesting of all of the executive’s outstanding time-vested RSUs;

36




the executive’s outstanding PBRSUs granted on or after January 1, 2012 shall vest on their normal vesting date to the extent applicable performance criteria are realized (provided that upon a change in control, all outstanding PBRSUs would immediately vest as if the performance criteria had been satisfied);
any earned but unpaid performance bonus for the immediately preceding calendar year; and
a pro rata annual performance bonus (calculated based on their performance bonus targets).: and

for Mr. Clancy, continuation of certain health and medical benefits for 18 months, or if earlier, the date as of which he is eligible to receive health insurance through another group plan.
39




The following table sets forth the compensation that Messrs. Shoshani, Clancy, and Tal would have been received by each of the Company’s executive officers had they been terminated without “cause,” or if they resigned with “good reason,” in either such case, as of December 31, 2015.2023.
Salary
Continuation
Salary
Continuation
BonusEquity grantsMedical benefit/pension
plan
Non-qualified
deferred
compensation
Total
(1)
 Salary
Continuation
 Bonus Equity grants Medical benefit/pension
plan
 Non-qualified
deferred
compensation
 Total
 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)  
Ziv Shoshani
Ziv Shoshani
Ziv Shoshani $962,649 $481,325 $1,632,865 $159,119 $883,866 $4,119,824$1,363,562$681,781$3,779,215$71,886$1,687,669$7,584,113
William M. Clancy 300,000 150,000 442,759 371,378 221,842 1,485,979William M. Clancy610,350264,485847,253503,363506,3312,731,782
Roland B. Desilets (6) - - - - - -
Thomas P. Kieffer 242,515 72,755 211,469 - 1,453,012 1,979,751
Amir TalAmir Tal417,575139,192342,778-899,545
____________________

(1)
(1)Represents two years’years of 20152023 base salary, paid over two years, for Mr. Shoshani, and one yeareighteen months of 20152023 base salary, paid over one year,eighteen months, for Messrs.Mr. Clancy and Kieffer.Mr. Tal.
(2)Represents the target performance bonus for each of our executive officersNEOs with respect to performance in 2015.2023. Pursuant to the employment agreements with our executive officers,NEOs, we are required to pay the target performance bonus for the year in which the executive officerNEO was terminated (pro-rated based on when termination occurred).
(3)
Represents the value of 144,246110,925 shares for Mr. Shoshani, 39,11324,868 shares for Mr. Clancy, and 18,68110,061 shares for Mr. KiefferTal of otherwise unvested restricted stock, RSUs and PBRSUs (assuming all performance criteria are met), based on $11.32,$34.07, the closing price of our Common Stockcommon stock on December 31, 2015.
2023.
(4)For Mr. Shoshani, this amount reflects the estimated value of five years’ worththree years of medical coverage for Mr. Shoshani, his spouse and his children under the age of 26, based on the value of such coverage at December 31, 20152023 and assuming 10% increases in annual premiums. For Mr. Clancy, this amount reflects the present value of the balance in his VPG Non-Qualified Retirement Plan account.account and eighteen months of COBRA payments.
(5)Represents each executive officer’sNEOs VPG KEWAP balance as of December 31, 2015,2023, as set forth in the “Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table.”
(6)At December 31, 2015, Mr. Desilets was not subject to a written severance agreement.


The following table sets forth the compensation that would have been received by each of the Company’s executive officersNEOs in the event a change of control occurred on December 31, 20152023 where the executives remained employed by the Company after such change of control.
Salary
Continuation
BonusEquity grantsMedical benefit/pension
plan
Non-qualified
deferred
compensation
Total
(1)
Ziv Shoshani$-$-$3,779,215$-$-$3,779,215
William M. Clancy--847,253--847,253
Amir Tal--342,778--342,778
  Salary
Continuation
 Bonus Equity grants Medical benefit/pension
plan
 Non-qualified
deferred
compensation
  Total
      (1)       
Ziv Shoshani $- $- $1,632,865 $- $- $1,632,865
William M. Clancy  -  -  442,759  -  -  442,759
Roland B. Desilets  -  -  -  -  -  -
Thomas P. Kieffer  -  -  211,469  -  -  211,469
____________________

(1)
(1)
Represents the value of 144,246110,925 shares for Mr. Shoshani, 39,11324,868 shares for Mr. Clancy, and 18,68110,061 shares for Mr. KiefferTal of otherwise unvested restricted stock, RSUs and PBRSUs (assuming all performance criteria are met), based on $11.32,$34.07, the closing price of our Common Stockcommon stock on December 31, 2015.
2023.


37




Impact on Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Balances
As described herein, the named executive officersNEOs are eligible to participate in a non-qualified deferred compensation plan. Each participant in VPG’s deferred compensation plan, or the “VPG KEWAP,” must elect, upon initial participation in the plan, the schedule of payments thereunder upon termination of such participant’s employment. In compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, Mr. Shoshani elected to receive a lump-sum distribution of the balance of his VPG KEWAP retirement account upon termination of his employment. Messrs.Mr. Clancy and Kieffer each elected to receive distributions from their respectivehis retirement accountsaccount over a ten-year period following termination of theirhis employment.
Impact on Outstanding Stock Options
Pursuant to the 2010 Stock Incentive Program, upon termination by retirement, death, or disability, an optionee has up to 12 months to exercise any vested options (limited by the expiration date of the respective options). Upon voluntary termination, the optionee has up to 60 days to exercise any vested options.
40




Impact on Restricted Stock Units
Certain executive officers received grants of RSUs. In the event of a change in control, or in the event of termination without cause, a voluntary termination by the executive for “good reason,” or a termination due to death or disability, all unvested time-based RSUs vest immediately. If such termination or change in control had occurred at December 31, 2015,2023, Messrs. Shoshani, Clancy, and KiefferTal would have vested immediately in 36,060, 9,77854,407, 12,440, and 4,6704,932 time-basedRSUs, respectively. In addition, in the event of termination without cause, a voluntary termination by the executive for "good reason" or a termination due to death or disability Messrs. Shoshani, Clancy, and KiefferTal would remain eligible to vest in up to 108,186, 29,33556,518, 12,428and 14,0115,129PBRSUs, respectively, subject to the satisfaction of performance criteria associated with those PBRSUs; suchPBRSUs. Such vesting would occur, if at all, upon the Compensation Committee’s determination that the applicable performance criteria have been achieved. On a change in control, however, Messrs. Shoshani, Clancy and Tal would have vested into all such PBRSUs immediately, as if the performance criteria had been satisfied at the target level.
Additional Information on Equity Compensation Plans
The following table provides certain information concerning our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2015.2023.
       Number of shares of
  Number of shares    common stock remaining
  of common stock to be Weighted average for future issuance
  issued upon exercise exercise price of under equity compensation
  of outstanding options outstanding options plans (excluding shares
  and rights and rights reflected in the first column)
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders (1)       
       2010 Stock Incentive Program (2)       
              Stock options 18,828 $18.92  
              Restricted Stock Units 509,516  n/a  
       Total 2010 Stock Incentive Program 528,344    484,766
        
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders -    -
       Total equity compensation plans 528,344    484,766
___________________
Number of shares of
Number of sharescommon stock remaining
of common stock to beWeighted averagefor future issuance
issued upon exerciseexercise price ofunder equity compensation
of outstanding optionsoutstanding optionsplans (excluding shares
and rightsand rightsreflected in the first column)
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders (1)
       2022 Stock Incentive Plan (2)
              Restricted Stock Units202,533n/a
       Total 2022 Stock Incentive Plan202,533525,239
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders--
       Total equity compensation plans202,533525,239
___________________
(1)
(1)Additional information about these plans is presented in Note 10 to the Company's consolidated financial statements, which is included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.10-K.
(2)The 20102022 Stock Incentive ProgramPlan provides for the grant of stock options, restricted stock, unrestricted stock, and RSUs. Therefore, the shares available for future issuance are presented only in total for the program.
41





38


CEO Pay Ratio
This information is provided in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, enacted in July 2010.

As permitted under the requirements of Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K that require us to identify our median employee once every three years and calculate total compensation for the employee each year, we identified our median-paid employee by looking at compensation between January 1, 2023 and December 31, 2023 for employees of the Company as of December 31, 2023. The total employee population considered was 2,446 people and we did not exclude any employees, other than our CEO. We used year-end local payroll records, consistently applied, to identify the median employee.

Mr. Shoshani’s annual total compensation for 2023 was $2,353,920, as disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table above. Our median employee’s annual total compensation, calculated consistent with Summary Compensation Table rules, for 2023 was $43,284. Accordingly, the ratio of our CEO’s pay to our median employee is 54:1.

The ratio is influenced by the mix of geographies where the company has operations, and the nature of the work employees perform in the different countries. Approximately 27% of the company’s total workforce is located in low cost countries, including in China and India. Many of these employees are involved in assembly and manufacturing tasks, particularly in China and India.

Pay Versus Performance
As required by Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship between “compensation actually paid” to our CEO and to our other NEOs and certain financial performance of the Company. Compensation actually paid, as determined under SEC requirements, does not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid to our executive officers during a covered year. For further information concerning the Company’s pay-for-performance philosophy and how the Company aligns executive compensation with the Company’s performance, refer to the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

Pay Versus Performance Table

Value of initial fixed $100 investment based on:
Year(1)
Summary Compensation Table Total for CEO
Compensation Actually Paid to CEO (2)
Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Other NEO's
Average Compensation Actually paid to Other NEO's (2)
Total Shareholder Return
Total Shareholder Return Peer Group (3)
Net Income
Adjusted Net Earnings(4)
2023$2,353,920 $1,251,223 $685,134 $491,198 $100.21 $129.44 $25,707,000 $29,669,000 
2022$2,721,053 $3,461,360 $791,514 $908,672 $113.68 $102.98 $36,063,000 $35,884,000 
2021$3,624,818 $4,704,237 $895,018 $1,057,375 $109.18 $121.54 $20,221,000 $25,606,000 
2020$2,240,175 $1,704,560 $702,482 $560,817 $92.59 $107.66 $10,787,000 $17,975,000 

Notes:
(1)For each covered year, the CEO was Ziv Shoshani. For each covered year, the Other NEOs were William M. Clancy and Amir Tal.
(2)For 2023, amounts reported in this column are based on the total compensation and the average of the total compensation reported for our CEO and Other NEOs, respectively in the Summary Compensation Table and adjusted as shown in the table below. Fair value of equity awards was computed in accordance with the Company’s methodology used for financial reporting purposes.
42






CEOAverage of Other NEOs
Total reported in 2023 Summary Compensation Table (SCT)$2,353,920 $685,134 
Less: Value of Stock & Option Awards reported in SCT(1,409,021)(238,187)
Less: Change in Pension Value and Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings in SCT(19,212)(16,743)
Plus: Pension Service Cost and impact of Pension Plan Amendments5,723 — 
Plus: Year-End value of Awards Granted in Fiscal Year that are Unvested and Outstanding825,772 139,593 
Plus: Change in Fair Value of Prior Year awards that are Outstanding and Unvested(322,910)(49,930)
Plus: FMV of Awards Granted this Year and that Vested this year— — 
Plus: Change in Fair Value (From Prior Year-End) of Prior Year awards that Vested this year(183,049)(28,669)
Less: Prior Year Fair Value of Prior Year awards that failed to vest this year.— — 
Total Adjustments(1,102,697)(193,936)
"Compensation Actually Paid" for Fiscal Year 2023$1,251,223 $491,198 



(3)Pursuant to Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the Company used the same peer group used for purposes of Item 201(e) of Regulation S-K. The table below shows the companies that comprised the peer group. Beginning in 2024, peer group TSR is to be based solely on the composition of the peer group in the reporting year, which resulted in a revised calculation of the 2020 peer group TSR from what was presented in the prior year report. Additionally, there were errors in the calculations of the peer group TSR that were reported in the prior year for 2022, 2021 and 2020. The corrected values have been presented in this proxy statement and represent an increase in the 2022 peer group TSR of $1.48 or 1.4%, an increase in the 2021 peer group TSR of $0.12 or 0.1%, and a decrease in the 2020 peer group TSR of $0.78 or 0.6%, when compared to the figures presented in the prior year proxy statement.

CTS Corp
Luna Innovations Inc.
inTEST Corporation
Kyowa
Spectris plc
TT Electronics
FARO Technologies Inc.
ESCO Technologies Inc.
(4)In accordance with SEC rules, the Company is required to include in the Pay versus Performance table the “most important” financial performance measure (as determined by the Company) used to link compensation actually paid to our named executive officers to Company performance for the most recently completed fiscal year. The Company determined Adjusted Net Earnings which is a metric included in our long-term incentive program, meets this requirement and therefore, we have included this financial performance measure in the Pay versus Performance table. For the fiscal years ended 2023 and 2022, a reconciliation of Adjusted Net Earnings to the nearest GAAP measure can be found in the Form 10-K. For the fiscal year ended 2021 and 2020, a reconciliation of Adjusted Net Earnings to the nearest GAAP measure can be found in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, which was filed with the SEC on March 1, 2023.

Description of the Relationship Between Compensation Actually Paid to our Named Executive Officers and Company Performance

The charts below describe the relationship between compensation actually paid to our chief executive officer and to our other named executive officers (as calculated above) and our financial and stock performance for the indicated years. In addition, the first table below compares our cumulative total shareholder return ("TSR") and peer group cumulative TSR for the indicated years.
43




1317
1319

44




1322





Company’s Most Important Financial Performance Measures

The following were the most important financial performance measures, as determined by the Company, that link the compensation actually paid to our CEO and Other NEOs to the Company’s performance for the most recently completed fiscal year.

Adjusted operating margin
Adjusted EBITDA
Cumulative adjusted net earnings
Cumulative adjusted free cash

Each of these financial performance measures are used in our incentive programs to determine the level of payout. For more information on each of these performance measures, see Annual Performance Cash Bonus and Equity Compensation beginning on page 26 of this Proxy Statement.

45




CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
VPG maintains employment agreements with our CEO and each of our other executive officers. See “Executive Compensation” herein. We historically have had significant agreements, transactions, and relationships with Vishay Intertechnology. See Note 217 to our consolidated financial statements included in the Form 10-K and “Agreements with Vishay Intertechnology” herein. For a more detailed discussion of these arrangements, see “Agreements with Vishay Intertechnology” in our information statement, dated June 22, 2010. The information statement was filed on June 22, 2010 as Exhibit 99.1 to our Registration Statement on Form 10.
Steven C. Klausner is Vice President and Treasurer of VPG. Mr. Klausner is the brother-in-law of Chairman Marc Zandman. During 2015, Mr. Klausner received salary, bonus, and benefits of $365,953.$400,740 for 2023.
Mr. Alon Shagir is an employee of Vishay Advanced Technologies, a subsidiary of Vishay Precision Group, Inc. Mr. Shagir is the brother-in-law of Marc Zandman. Mr. Shagir received salary, bonus, and benefits of $190,586 for 2023.
Our Board has adopted a written Related Party Transaction Policy that governs the review and approval or ratification of related party transactions between our Company and our directors and executive officers and their families; stockholders owning in excess of 5% of any class of our securities; and certain affiliates of these persons. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has the responsibility to administer the policy. All related party transactions, including employment relationships and charitable contributions, must be approved or ratifiedin advance by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Members of the Committeecommittee may not participate in any review, consideration, or approval of any transaction involving such member, any family member of such member, or any entity with which such member is affiliated. A copy of the Related Party Transaction Policy is available to stockholders in print upon request.
Our Related Party Transaction Policy requires that all new employment relationships with a family member of a director or executive officer be approved by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Committeecommittee also must undertake an annual review of on-going employment relationships of family members of any director or executive officer.
Agreements with Vishay Intertechnology
In connection with the spin-off, we and Vishay Intertechnology entered into certain agreements which govern our relationship with Vishay Intertechnology and provide for the allocation of employee benefits, tax and other liabilities and obligations. The following are brief summaries of the terms of the material agreements we entered into with Vishay Intertechnology. Each summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the applicable agreement.
The Separation
In a series of transactions culminating on July 6, 2010, Vishay Intertechnology moved its precision measurement and foil resistor businesses to us, including assets and equity interests of certain subsidiaries of Vishay Intertechnology, and we moved a small amount of assets that we held and that did not constitute part of our business to Vishay Intertechnology. Except as specified in the master separation agreement, we agreed to assume and perform all of the liabilities (including contingent liabilities) and obligations arising under or relating to the operation of the precision measurement and foil resistor businesses or the assets and equity interests that were transferred to us as part of the separation, whether incurred before or after the separation.
Exchangeable Notes and Warrants
In connection with the spin-off from Vishay Intertechnology, we were required to assume a portion of Vishay Intertechnology’s indebtedness arising out of a 2002 exchangeable note and warrant financing. Accordingly, we issued notes with an initial principal amount of approximately $10.0 million, exchangeable for shares of our common stock to such persons, as required by the put and call agreement between Vishay Intertechnology and the holders of the corresponding 2002 Vishay Intertechnology notes due December 13, 2102. Effective August 28, 2013, a holder of the Company’s exchangeable notes exercised its option to exchange approximately $5.9 million principal amount of the notes for 259,687 shares of our common stock. Following this transaction, we have outstanding exchangeable unsecured notes with a principal amount of approximately $4.1 million, which are exchangeable for an aggregate of 181,537 shares of our common stock.
Tax Matters Agreement
In connection with the master separation agreement, we entered into a tax matters agreement with Vishay Intertechnology. This agreement (1) governs the allocation of U.S. federal, state, local, and foreign tax liability between us and Vishay Intertechnology, (2) provides for certain restrictions and indemnities in connection with the tax treatment of the distribution, and (3) addresses certain other tax-related matters.


39




Lease Agreements
We and Vishay Intertechnology, or our respective subsidiaries, entered into lease agreements for space in Malvern, Pennsylvania and Akita, Japan. In each case, the lease is at a market rate and on customary terms for a lease of its nature. Otherwise, weWe intend to continue thesethe lease arrangementsarrangement in Akita, Japan for the foreseeable future. The lease arrangement in Malvern, Pennsylvania was terminated at the end of January 2024.

40
46







PROPOSAL THREE

ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) enables our stockholders to vote to approve, on an advisory or non-binding basis, the compensation of our NEOs as disclosed in this proxy statement in accordance with SEC rules.
As described in detail under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” our executive compensation programs are designed to attract, motivate, and retain our NEOs, who are critical to our success. Under these programs, our NEOs are rewarded for the achievement of specific annual, long-term and strategic goals, corporate goals, and the realization of increased stockholder value. Please read the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for additional details about our executive compensation programs, including information about the fiscal year 2023 compensation of our NEOs.

This proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, gives our stockholders the opportunity to express their views on our NEOs' compensation. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our NEOs and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this proxy statement. We are asking our stockholders to approve the following advisory resolution at the 2024 Annual Meeting:

RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Named Executive Officers, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement pursuant to the SEC’s executive compensation disclosure rules (which disclosure includes the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and the narrative discussion that accompanies the compensation tables), is hereby approved.

The "say-on-pay" vote is advisory, and therefore not binding on the Company, the Compensation Committee or the Board. Our Board and our Compensation Committee value the opinions of our stockholders and to the extent there is any significant vote against the NEO compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement, we will consider our stockholders’ concerns and the Compensation Committee will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns. Following a vote by our stockholders at our 2023 Annual Meeting, our Board determined that we would conduct a “say-on-pay” vote annually. We expect that the next say-on-pay vote will occur at the Company’s 2025 Annual Meeting.


The Board unanimously recommends that you vote "FOR" the approval of the compensation of the NEOs as disclosed in this proxy statement pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion.

47




OTHER MATTERS
This proxy statement includes all of the business that the Board intends to present at the annual meeting. The Board is not aware of any other matters proposed to be presented at the meeting. If any other matters are properly brought before the annual meeting or any adjournment thereof, it is the intention of the personpersons named in the accompanying form of proxy to vote the proxy on such matters in accordance with their judgment.
AVAILABILITY OF ANNUAL REPORT AND FORM 10-K TO STOCKHOLDERS
This proxy statement and our 20152023 Annual Report to Stockholders, which includes our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2015,2023, are available at our Investor Relations page at http:https://ir.vpgsensors.com.ir.vpgsensors.com. VPG will provide to any stockholder, upon written request and without charge, a copy of our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the financial statements, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All requests for such reports should be directed to Investor Relations, Vishay Precision Group, Inc., 3 Great Valley Parkway, Suite 150, Malvern, PA 19355, telephone number (919) 374-5501.(484) 321-5300.
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS AND NOMINATIONS FOR 20172025 ANNUAL MEETING
Stockholder proposals submitted to us pursuant to Rule 14a-8 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for inclusion in our proxy statement and form of proxy for our 20172025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must be received by us no later than December 16, 201610, 2024 and must comply with the requirements of the proxy rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
In accordance with our current bylaws, for a director nomination or a proposal of a stockholder to be raised from the floor and presented at our 20172025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, other than a stockholder proposal intended to be included in our proxy statement and submitted pursuant to Rule 14a-8 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act, of 1934, a stockholder’s notice must be delivered to, or mailed and received at, our principal executive offices, together with all supporting documentation required by our bylaws, (A) not prior to February 27, 2017close of business January 22, 2025 nor later than March 27, 2017close of business on February 21, 2025 or (B) in the event that the 20172025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is held prior to April 26, 201722, 2025 or after July 25, 2017,June 21, 2025, notice by the stockholder must be so received not later than the 60thtenth (10th) day prior tofollowing the day on which such notice of the date of the annual meeting was mailed or if the firstsuch public announcement of the date of suchthe annual meeting is less than 100 days prior to the date of such annual meeting, not later than the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made by us.was made. A stockholder’s notice of intention to present a director nomination or a proposal should be addressed to our Secretary, Vishay Precision Group, Inc., 3 Great Valley Parkway, Suite 150, Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355.

The form of proxy issued with our 20172025 proxy statement will confer discretionary authority to vote for or against any proposal made by a stockholder at our 20172025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and which is not included in our proxy statement. However, such discretionary authority is not permitted to be exercised if the stockholder proponent has given notice to our Secretary of such proposal between January 22, 2025 and February 27, 2017 and March 27, 201721, 2025 and certain other conditions provided for in the SEC’s rules have been satisfied.



In addition, to comply with the universal proxy rules, stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than our nominees must comply with the additional requirements of Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act.

By order of the Board of Directors,


/s/ Roland B. DesiletsWilliam M. Clancy
Roland B. DesiletsWilliam M. Clancy
Vice President, General CounselChief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary


April 15, 20169, 2024


4148









Page_1_Image_0001.jpg



VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up untilinformation. Vote by 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date.on May 21, 2024. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

                                                                                                                      During The Meeting -
ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALSGo to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/VPG2024
If you would like to reduce                                                                                                                      You may attend the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronicallymeeting via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and when prompted, indicatevote during the meeting. Have the information that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronicallyis printed in future years.the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions.

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up untilinstructions. Vote by 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date.on May 21, 2024. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.


VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.
VISHAY PRECISION GROUP, INC.

3 GREAT VALLEY PARKWAY

SUITE 150

MALVERN, PA 19355
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:��
E08972-P77020KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY




VISHAY PRECISION GROUP, INC.For All
Withhold

All
For All ExceptTo withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark "For All Except" and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below.
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR

the following:
1.1.Election of Directorsooo
oo
Nominees
01) Janet Clarke
Nominees:
01)02) Wesley Cummins
03) Sejal Shah Gulati04) Bruce Lerner05) Saul Reibstein
06) Ziv Shoshani07) Timothy Talbert08) Marc Zandman
02) Janet Clarke
03) Saul Reibstein
04) Timothy Talbert
05) Ziv Shoshani
06) Cary Wood


The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposal 2.proposals 2 and 3.
ForAgainstAbstainForAgainstAbstain
2.2.To ratifyapprove the appointmentratification of ErnstBrightman Almagor Zohar & Young LLPCo., a firm in the Deloitte global network, as Vishay Precision Group, Inc.'s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2016.2024.o
o
o
3.
To approve the non-binding resolution relating to the executive compensation.
o
o
o
NOTE: Such other business as may be brought properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.
For address change/comments, mark here.
(see reverse for instructions)
YesNoo
Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting.oo
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor,

administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign

personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate

or partnership name by authorized officer.
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]DateSignature (Joint Owners)Date









Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:
The Notice and Proxy Statement and 2015 Annual Report to Stockholders are available at www.proxyvote.com.
www.proxyvote.com
E08973-P77020
VISHAY PRECISION GROUP, INC.
Annual Meeting of ShareholdersStockholders
May 22, 2024 9:00 AM ETMay 26, 2016
This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors
The undersigned hereby appoints Ziv Shoshani and William M. Clancy, and Roland B. Desilets, and each of them acting individually, with full power of substitution, to vote all shares of common stock and Class B common stock of Vishay Precision Group, Inc. which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of ShareholdersStockholders of Vishay Precision Group, Inc. to be held at The Desmond Hotel and Conference Center, 1 Liberty Boulevard, Malvern, PA 19355,via remote communication on Wednesday, May 22, 2024 at 9:00 a.m., local time, on Thursday, May 26, 2016,AM ET, and at any postponement or adjournment thereof, hereby ratifying all that said proxies or their substitutes may do by virtue hereof, and the undersigned authorizes and instructs said proxies to vote as indicated on the reverse side.
This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted as directed, or if no direction is given, will be voted "FOR" all director nominees and "FOR" proposal 2.proposals 2 and 3. This proxy, when properly executed, also delegates discretionary authority with respect to any other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting of Stockholders or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
The stockholder signing this proxy hereby acknowledges receipt of the notice of annual meeting and proxy statement.
PLEASE DATE, SIGN AND RETURN THIS PROXY PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
Address change/comments: __________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
(If you noted any Address Changes and/or Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)
Continued and to be signed on reverse side